Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nedruod
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nedruod
6d ago
You assume alignment and marketable are the same. That's not true. You would willingly work with an unaligned model. At best, you might say you wouldn't if you knew, but (a) you might not know, (b) you wouldn't be representat
2.
▲
Every Reward Bends: Security Incentives and the OpenAI Hugging Face Incident
(substack.norabble.com)
1 points
by
nedruod
17d ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
The Defender's Window
(openai.com)
3 points
by
nedruod
1mo ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Why It Hasn't Happened Yet: Capable AI and Malicious Intent
(substack.norabble.com)
2 points
by
nedruod
1mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
Mark Zuckerberg: The Future Is for Everyone
(about.fb.com)
4 points
by
nedruod
1mo ago
|
2 comments
6.
▲
by
nedruod
1mo ago
It's not so absolute. In the first order, yes, if you don't grow generation or transmission, it has to increase prices. But in the second order, those things happen, and the end result can be lower prices on scale. That leaves it
7.
▲
Banning data centers would blow up the U.S. economy
(noahpinion.blog)
11 points
by
nedruod
1mo ago
|
5 comments
8.
▲
by
nedruod
1mo ago
I use them, and the reason is simple - they attract users. All these directions to not use AI here, not use it there, not use it anywhere, they're all basically missing the point, which is what someone was trying to do in the first pla
9.
▲
Nobody Was Watching: Anthropic, OpenAI, and Open Models
(substack.norabble.com)
10 points
by
nedruod
2mo ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
nedruod
2mo ago
The China point cuts both ways though. The main point from that would be that everyone's opinions are irrelevant. No point in supporting open-weight, because China is going to do what China is going to do. No point in supporting less o
11.
▲
by
nedruod
2mo ago
If you think I've insinuated they don't have a motivation, you've misread. It's undeniable they have motivations (though I pointed out, the signatories and non-signatories all have the same motivations). From a PR perspe
12.
▲
by
nedruod
2mo ago
Ah, the position they don't state. So why respond to this press-release, which doesn't state that, since obviously it adds zero value? And why aren't the companies that signed the letter supporting open-weights, who have the
13.
▲
by
nedruod
2mo ago
This take is poorly informed and poorly thought out. It's just a cynical vibe, not a cogent argument. If they wanted to squash the competitors, they'd advocate for a ban on Open-Weight models. How else are they going to prevent th
14.
▲
An OpenAI Model Escaped Its Sandbox. Where Was the Observer?
(substack.norabble.com)
2 points
by
nedruod
2mo ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
OpenAI Model Hacks into HuggingFace During Cybersecurity Evaluation
(thezvi.substack.com)
3 points
by
nedruod
2mo ago
|
1 comments
16.
▲
Tech jobs market in 2026, part 3: hiring managers and job seekers
(newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com)
3 points
by
nedruod
2mo ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
Why American data centers can't plug in
(worksinprogress.co)
2 points
by
nedruod
3mo ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
nedruod
3mo ago
In terms of slippery slopes, this argument is climbing atop one. Where does that end? Should we ban doctors from performing surgeries that would save someone's hearing? Should we ban protective gear that might diminish the size of the
19.
▲
by
nedruod
3mo ago
Can I mention the irony that this seems a "bit" paranoid? "bit" because, yes, you do have some good examples of failures to call to, but still, consider how much good would have to be chucked to have avoided those by a g
20.
▲
by
nedruod
3mo ago
Sure, you can imagine it, but you should be able to imagine better solutions too. Far easier to ask for a government ID, or better yet, have a third party, which is trusted, use a cross-check, so that the raw data is never shared, just a bi
21.
▲
by
nedruod
3mo ago
You cannot undo anything that's history, including not testing. If you missed a chance to get other tests or treatment early in life, you don't get the chance to fix that later either. It would be easier to be cautious on penetra
22.
▲
Should every baby's DNA be sequenced?
(economist.com)
23 points
by
nedruod
3mo ago
|
88 comments
23.
▲
Or Equivalent Experience: Lazy Mistakes in Hiring and the Truth Behind Jobs Data
(substack.norabble.com)
2 points
by
nedruod
3mo ago
|
0 comments
24.
▲
Challenges for AI Misuse Prevention: Jurisdictions, Open Models, and Privacy
(substack.norabble.com)
2 points
by
nedruod
4mo ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
AI Safety Is Underfunded by Design: Model for Incentive-Aligned AI Safety Policy
(substack.norabble.com)
1 points
by
nedruod
4mo ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
Adversaries Leverage AI for Vulnerability Exploitation
(cloud.google.com)
1 points
by
nedruod
4mo ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
Focus Areas for the Anthropic Institute
(anthropic.com)
2 points
by
nedruod
4mo ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
AI Companies Can't Regulate Themselves. They Should Regulate Each Other
(lawfaremedia.org)
1 points
by
nedruod
5mo ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
Academics Need to Wake Up on AI, Part III
(popularbydesign.org)
3 points
by
nedruod
5mo ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
Update on AI CyberSecurity
(substack.norabble.com)
1 points
by
nedruod
5mo ago
|
0 comments
More ›