nbulka

5 ms·

1.
by nbulka 5d ago
Shouldn't the cybersecurity tests be done on an airgapped, company-internal intranet? A network meant to mock the internet. Do not "test in production" like OpenAI did. I'm mulling over if that be a good SaaS product or
2.
by nbulka 8d ago
When I drive by a Flock camera, my streaming music in my 2014 Rav starts to get scrambled. These cameras are intercepting bluetooth. It seems Toyota didn't account for that latency :facepalm:
3.
by nbulka 9d ago
Seriously ... the more things they flag as 'suspicious' the more data they can train on!! Brilliant reason for the internal AI to go rogue
4.
by nbulka 9d ago
Or everyone is stealing from everyone, including users... maybe why all the ethics people are leaving or getting fired. What a fiasco
5.
by nbulka 9d ago
There's a loophole in the terms of service at least for Anthropic which allows the use of dark patterns to "borrow" your (even paid) data. talking about this... Was this chat helpful? 1 That button you always click, gotcha!
6.
by nbulka 14d ago
And people give Platonists a hard time …
7.
by nbulka 1mo ago
They chose the wrong word "watermarking." Perhaps they find the statistics _after_ a certain amount of text is generated at scale, so that it doesn't affect the fidelity or integrity of the LLMs output. There is evidence this
8.
by nbulka 1mo ago
Check out the work of Godel Turing and Chaitin!
9.
by nbulka 1mo ago
IANAM but this might be unexplored territory because Jensen polynomials are no longer considered a "plausible route" to proving the Riemann Hypothesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07206
10.
by nbulka 4mo ago
I posted a comment very similar in spirit - we’ve adopted “perfect is the enemy of good” as the operative maxim instead of maximizing accountability and now we may need to flip as AI does that first part quickly enough.
11.
by nbulka 4mo ago
This is not an AI problem this is a “move fast and break things” philosophical problem that has always been lurking in the low-risk, high-reward SaaS industry. It’s just been fed steroids.
12.
by nbulka 8mo ago
Argh went down right in the middle of me solving the Riemanm Hypothesis. If they claim AGI … I’ll take my million dollars! :)
13.
by nbulka 1y ago
You mean this popup? https://imgur.com/afqMi0Z
14.
by nbulka 1y ago
Training on personal data people thought was going to remain private vs. stuff out in public view (copyright or not), are two different magnitudes of ethics breaches. Opt OUT instead of Opt IN for this is CRAZY in my opinion. I hope that th
15.
by nbulka 1y ago
Because they have terms of service they have to adhere to. We need laws to be lawful.
16.
by nbulka 1y ago
No you don't. You don't have to assume people are going to be bad! We should not normalize it either.
17.
by nbulka 1y ago
Don't normalize this. There are contractual obligations that we have to enforce in order to keep our privacy and humanity.
18.
by nbulka 1y ago
!!!!!!!!!! this... all the times HIPAA and data privacy laws get ignored directly in Jira tickets too. SMH
19.
by nbulka 1y ago
For those who do not, or cannot, read this announcement prior to September 28th (think people in the hospital, traveling, missed an email ..) is this not a total breach of contract? Legally, I don't understand how Anthropic's lawy
20.
by nbulka 1y ago
We think the universe had to "begin" because we "began" and tend to anthropomorphize. Is that necessarily true? The universe is under no obligation to have a beginning. Sail around the Earth and you might just end up rig
21.
by nbulka 2y ago
when a theory makes claims about events that fall outside of the physical system they become metaphysical: age of the universe, creator or not, teleology, interpretations of probability, primacy of logic (are we allowing for the law of excl
22.
by nbulka 2y ago
A steel man version of scientism by definition has to be scientism, and I imagine that looks like strict determinisn/reductionism. I imagine it would go along the lines of "we acknowledge that our theories invoke notions of probab
23.
by nbulka 2y ago
I think a healthy dose of skepticism is warranted for claims like the age of the universe. The closer the measurements are to a human magnitude, the more likely they are to hold up to future science.
24.
by nbulka 2y ago
For sure. And that underscores the probabilities that are either are true.
25.
by nbulka 2y ago
something that makes metaphysical claims. Like the age of the universe, and a universal telos or lack thereof.
26.
by nbulka 2y ago
6,000 was the guess of technology 200 years ago. They had their reasons. Today 14 billion is the technology of our time. We have our reasons. My point is that technological progression seems to support the idea that 14 billion will seem lik
27.
by nbulka 2y ago
That would be interesting! I'd love for someone to tackle that.
28.
by nbulka 2y ago
Certain?
29.
by nbulka 2y ago
Can you BELIEVE people once thought the beginning of everything was 6,000 years ago? Thank goodness every sane person is unequivocally certain that it was actually 14 billion years now!
30.
by nbulka 2y ago
What do you all think about this? I spent a lot of time on it last year and then put it on the backburner but I was thinking of updating some of the levels to reflect this Practical Vim Command Workflow. https://www.vimarcade.com

More ›