natt941

4 ms·

1.
by natt941 1y ago
It's fun to see package management improvements move full circle—lessons from Ruby package management contributed to Rust, Rust is helping improve package management for Python, and now Python package management is inspiring improvemen
2.
by natt941 2y ago
+1 to this, my son really enjoys programming for pico-8
3.
by natt941 3y ago
I kinda miss the fun days of using addresses to physical memory. (Maybe I'm wrong but I've always assumed that explicit use of handles went out of fashion because virtual address lookup is, in effect, a handle.)
4.
by natt941 4y ago
Anyone know how this relates to what Modular is building? (I gather Chris Lattner had been involved with XLA while at Google.)
5.
by natt941 4y ago
Just to be clear, this content isn't from Stanford per se, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is an academic publication that's hosted by Stanford (and was started by and continues to be run by Stanford faculty, but is mostly
6.
AWS Cost Explorer tips (and links) for understanding compute-related costs(blog.coiled.io)
1 points by natt941 4y ago|0 comments
7.
by natt941 5y ago
Most folks who do traditional epistemology would say that you could have very good justification yet fail to have knowledge because what you believe isn't true. And yes, this probably means that in some sense, when you know something,
8.
by natt941 5y ago
> Under the "justified true belief" one might say that their knowledge was undermined because they learned it wasn't true. But their teacher, born (say) circa 1970, has no more direct access to the truth of who was the 3rd
9.
by natt941 5y ago
Often we might think we know something and later conclude that we were wrong... but in this case, it's common to say "I thought I knew such-and-such, but I didn't". Also, for what it's worth, most people don'
10.
by natt941 5y ago
If "quality" means something like strength of the evidence, then couldn't you still have Gettier-like cases, so long as the evidence doesn't entail the truth of the belief? (suppose the HR department printed the wrong na
11.
by natt941 5y ago
Just to be clear, it isn't that people though justification (which, yes, can be probabilistic/non-deductive) invariable leads to knowledge, and these aren't supposed to be cases of believing the right thing for the wrong reas
12.
by natt941 5y ago
I can understand why the idea of more structured, object-like input and output is appealing, but after using PowerShell for a while, my take is that it's much harder to manipulate objects into a consistent format than it is to manipula