natemo

5 ms·

1.
by natemo 5y ago
I love this idea. I always like to see side projects (even in place of a "real job") and this seems like the perfect way to integrate it with a resume. Funny, humble, and probably a pretty honest job title for a lot of developers
2.
by natemo 5y ago
This is really creative, nicely done!
3.
by natemo 5y ago
I actually suspect this statement blindsided most of the company. It seems the way DHH and Jason operate is to lead with big philosophies and work backwards to the practical implications. This is not just evident in their company practices,
4.
by natemo 5y ago
Great idea! I have watched some lectures/talks online with terrible camera work (e.g. panning to the speaker when they are asking the audience to read the slide). Another solution I've seen was to play a simultaneous video feed of
5.
by natemo 6y ago
Nitpicky, but I think "It's okay for x, not for y" when describing nascent technology is a bit shortsighted. Who knows how this evolves and what new applications people may devise? For today, I agree: it's just art.
6.
by natemo 6y ago
100% - it's clear how everything works because they've pared down to the essentials. For their target market of small dev teams who just need to ship code, it's a godsend.
7.
by natemo 6y ago
While I agree with much of the article, I think the following points were not sufficiently explored: 1. I got the impression that he felt this "fauxtomation" was the final iteration of any service practicing it. To me, "fauxt
8.
by natemo 6y ago
Some pretty thought provoking points. Most of the argument seems to hinge on the idea that power laws are proof of centralization and that we're just seeing them manifest in different forms. Most of the examples of dominant personaliti