nate_nowack

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by nate_nowack 1y ago

   yea i dont think there's any blocker from a protocol perspective, im just saying i'd love to see it happen. adoption for sure among the largest hurdles id guess
2. 2.▲
   by nate_nowack 1y ago

   would love fb marketplace disruptor on atproto
3. 3.▲
   by nate_nowack 1y ago

   yea its a popular DX at this point: https://blog.alternatebuild.dev/marvin-3x/
4. 4.▲
   by nate_nowack 1y ago

   no https://bsky.app/profile/alternatebuild.dev/post/3lg5a5fq4dc...
5. 5.▲
   by nate_nowack 3y ago

   yeah this seems to be pretty much the same interface as `fn` from marvin, except w/o pydantic (see https://github.com/PrefectHQ/marvin?tab=readme-ov-file#-buil... )
6. 6.▲
   by nate_nowack 3y ago

   as with marvin, you can just swap the base url and use any of the oss proxy libs that clone the openai api (but since they don't do function calling [except for mistral i think], its not as good afaik)
7. 7.▲
   by nate_nowack 3y ago

   hi, just seeing this! you're correct that normal chatgpt wouldn't crawl the URL, but ai_fns can have plugins like the DuckDuckGo plugin / VisitURL plugin which can be invoked by the underlying Bot if it decides its helpful to
8. 8.▲
   by nate_nowack 3y ago

   interesting! I hadn't seen that before ai_fn is just a specific way to use Marvin's Bot abstraction, which is one of the few abstractions Marvin offers but a couple differences I notice off the bat between ai_fn and com2fun: - mar
9. 9.▲
   by nate_nowack 3y ago

   Hi! This example was produced using GPT 3.5 turbo, where yes, the LLM does not always align ideally. I used 3.5 for the example since that's Marvin's default and I know many people wouldn't have gpt4 access yet (which is sign