natbobc

5 ms·

1.
by natbobc 2mo ago
It’s typically called notarization but in North America it is often supplemented by a witness depending on the class of document. Many documents don’t even require that.
2.
by natbobc 2mo ago
Had an acquaintance that worked in strategy have to explain something similar for the Netherlands. They thought they could just cut everyone and be off the books no repercussions.
3.
by natbobc 2mo ago
I’m not justifying it but I don’t think it was a problem on American soil yet… and just more “not my problem”. Totally shortsighted.
4.
by natbobc 3mo ago
DOGE probably didn’t help matters but the problem started to rise in 2023. My gut reaction was “damn that DOGE!” too but they didn’t start with cuts until 2025. So it likely just exasperated an already growing concern. This is the same kind
5.
by natbobc 3mo ago
And that is what pixel tracking is for. :)
6.
by natbobc 3mo ago
Is entirely context dependent. I can agree in some scenarios but when it’s a utility or gov site that I can’t really avoid it’s less straightforward.
7.
by natbobc 9mo ago
If this has a wifi antenna port would be very useful for marina wifi if you’re sailing around.
8.
by natbobc 11mo ago
The article is comparing 2 scenarios that have other explanations: a fire sale of a large fleet and Tesla which has an image problem because of its leadership. I’m not saying the article is wrong I’d just like to see broader representation
9.
by natbobc 1y ago
A vocal minority are freedom loving. A significant number are hooked on consumer debt. I feel like any sweeping generalization is going to be wrong… especially when referencing the USA which is basically 50 countries and has a population ex
10.
by natbobc 2y ago
> I am a backend developer using Spring Boot and Java. If your goal is speed to market use what you know which is Spring Boot and Java. If your aim is to learn something new then go with Django or sprinkle in some Kotlin incrementally (e
11.
by natbobc 3y ago
Feels like a bad point in the curve to try and sell them. “Oh our internal hypecycle is done… we’ll put them in the market now that they’re all worn out.
12.
by natbobc 3y ago
Probably that’s the scenario. You want something simple and narrowly focused. Advanced and infinitely configurable isn’t always a virtue.
13.
by natbobc 3y ago
Looks like a release about 2 weeks ago but otherwise not sure.
14.
by natbobc 3y ago
I find it mildly devious when numbers are inflated by changing the period from seconds to days. Aeron and NSQ have slightly different design principles. Which can easily be identified in their feature list. Aeron’s origins are exchanges for
15.
by natbobc 3y ago
It’s all swings and roundabouts has been since the broad adoption of computers. I expect in a few years time when everyone’s forgotten the pain points that drove them to decentralize there’ll be a big move to centralize again. Someone will
16.
by natbobc 3y ago
Everything’s benefits and tradeoffs. With this model there’s a clear ownership model. I’m not suggesting it’s right for everyone but it is a trend we’ve noticed with a number of clients over the last 2-3 years.
17.
by natbobc 3y ago
we have hundreds of clients most on k8s or openshift. Many of them are shifting to smaller team or division oriented clusters so that they can move at their own pace in consuming capabilities, tools, security practises, etc. It also simplif
18.
by natbobc 3y ago
Phone autocorrect… thanks!
19.
by natbobc 3y ago
Comparing a single function to an entire ecosystem is crazy. Making an LTS imposes a skew of compatibility and support to all downstream vendors as well as the core team. The core team has done a great job on keeping GAed resources stable a
20.
by natbobc 4y ago
I would even go so far as to say free users aren’t customers in a platform like this. There’s no revenue model and if it’s “run without constraint” you get some fun scaling problems but those types of issues can sometimes lead to optimizati
21.
by natbobc 8y ago
Thanks! Was faffing with it... the "help" isn't very helpful on how it formats. Sadly can't edit now. :/
22.
by natbobc 8y ago
It doesn't sound like a great situation to be in. It sounds like the founder has strong opinions. I suspect he subscribes to Trunk Based Development[1] and Continuous Delivery[2]. He also likely wants to follow the practises that &quot
23.
by natbobc 8y ago
Agree in many cases you can do this however with point 2 the removal of a function(s) is literally the aim. The accretion of functions benefits legacy systems however its tradeoff is potential harm to users new and unfamiliar with the libra
24.
by natbobc 8y ago
I think the reference might be more in relation to OSS tooling such as docker, kubernetes, and a lot of the other stuff in the CNCF project catalogue which is often VC backed start-ups with OSS codebases.
25.
by natbobc 8y ago
To be fair I think most of the OSS languages are Cathedrals. Golang recently had an uproar over dep (community lead initiative) vs vgo (core committer). Ruby seems similar. With the recent departure of Guido as BDFL I think Python is the ex
26.
by natbobc 8y ago
there was freedom I feel Ruby had that Python didn't which allowed Ruby to successfully go from 1.8 to 1.9; * Ruby had better dependency management. Python's only recently introduced Pipenv which provides a standard approach for m
27.
by natbobc 8y ago
I agree with the principle that you shouldn't arbitrarily change API's. I disagree if it is extended to being an unbreakable contract. There are specific scenarios where people should consider breaking changes most of which fall u
28.
by natbobc 8y ago
I have enormous respect for Alex et al that are maintaining Clojure at Cognitect. From my observations there tends to be few changes in core which is reinforced by a fireside chat with the guys at Cognitect showing the level of Java code ch
29.
by natbobc 8y ago
I mentioned in another comment but many countries have free data for WhatsApp plans which kind of entrenches their position. They might lose out eventually but it won't be overnight.
30.
by natbobc 8y ago
In Argentina many cellular plans include 30 days of WhatsApp for free on pay-as-you-go plans. Even if you lapse your payment for the 30 days you still have WhatsApp texting. Interestingly audio, photos, and video don't work.

More ›