Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
narinxas
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
they already signed it over when their for-profit subsidiary made a deal with Microsoft
2.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
just in time for nobody to really care about programming because LLMs are so good at translation and all computer code and programing are a subfield of linguistics...
3.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
I'm neither obscuring nor revealing a truth becuase these events are ongoing. and I'm being quick and lose with the use of words. facebook cannot merge with microsoft because facebook is a subsidiary of meta corporation. but on th
4.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
no, I did say "literal alphabet" i.e. not some bigger corporation... but I play with words, so take it as you are able i'm saying something closer to: if microsoft merges with facebook, then they really are both trying to get
5.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
is the type of wealth that makes land be worth more in some places than in others this gets really difficult when consdiering that the same unit of wealth also prices food, AND gambling
6.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
so who has (owns, can build) LLMs-sized datacenters? doesn't facebook (i.e. Meta) have their own infrastructure??? my "high level" view of this: the letter M (microsoft xOr meta) fighting for the ONE spot in the literal "
7.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
well, tuta's business model seem to boil down to "vendor lock in" I say this as a paying customer, but I'll admit I haven't decided how I feel about the new plans (as announced together with the name change) so mayb
8.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
well, tuta's business model seem to boil down to "vendor lock in" (from my viewpoint, I pay for their service and I haven't decided how I feel about the new plans so maybe my opinion is outdated)
9.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
money is a manifestation of (collective) energy combined conceptually with "that which has andor holds most value" where value is a dynamic concept whose precise meaning (significance) changes
10.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
I think you misspelled "predicated" but I don't even know... predicted xOR predicAted
11.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
there are much cheaper ways, chief amongst them is to use paper and pencils
12.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
one man's luxury... how did you learn to program computers without computers around?
13.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
i'm just exactly at that "moment in life" where it's either 'make' money (i.e. collect it from others using trade) or recieve welfare (ask for donations, beg on the streets, call parents...)
14.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
I'm asking a question without an answer
15.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
the more people out there that write, the less writtings by people are worth scarcity never creates value, but it always incresases it but also: the more pople have written, the cheaper text and AI bot training become which makes me feel in
16.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
you're ignoring my point, well.. not exactly "ignoring", more like explaining how and why the issue I was critizicing is completely irrelevant from where you stand however, thanks to all this dialogue, do see where my own cri
17.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
Number "one" is invented. Zero is discovered the circle is invented, the value of PI is discovered
18.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
it's the political principles I'm critizicing. the technical problem is really essentially a matter of trust, blockchains solved this problem in the technical sense. the opreations of large organization are typically private prope
19.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
every major business company has also done this for the USA... not just tech companies so I agree, business as usual
20.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
firefox and being able to compile it on you machine may do the trick for a little while but policy decisions aren't like technical ones.... principles are at play at every layer above the strictly-technical discussion
21.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
to them who find this comment exagerated (hyperbollic?) there are things that through symbolism come to signify life-or-death scenario across different contexts (i.e. life or dead of what-exactly?) these "ad-tech" wars aren't
22.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
but what does this mean in terms of VISA vs MasterCard?
23.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
this is an instance of the mistake of putting safety first, before health. if safety is more important than health, that means that it is ok to shoot first and ask questions later
24.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
interesting,,, you say it's "peoples"... but this made me realize it is also entire animal species... most mammalian animals alive today are either human or death, most exceptions are famous species......
25.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
from the other side: "in order to unify people, give them a common enemy"
26.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
reminds me of my own opinion that a lot of what goes on in academia, along other 'dynastic' systems of lineage-tracking, apprentice-master chains, IN large institutional settings (groups) I think there's a lot of collective t
27.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
my point has very little to do with process it seems to me that you're arguing back that SBOMs are just a list, so how can it be a big deal? my point is an issue about the whole reality of needing SBOMs. clearly they have something to
28.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
but what I am really wondering about is how much money (if any) was the vulnerability worth up the moment when google also discovered this?
29.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
so let me rephrase my original comment using more text I see them "bending over backwards" to protect their right to keep an advantage to use, if they deem it necessary, against any one else. this is why they go to such lengths
30.
▲
by
narinxas
3y ago
I wonder how much sooner than google did intel employees found this issue
More ›