Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nanodeath
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nanodeath
11mo ago
Including this one, 34 times :')
2.
▲
by
nanodeath
2y ago
To add to the anecdata here, I had covid for a week (bedridden but otherwise not that bad), then had a single day in which I tested negative, and then it rebounded for a week, due to Paxlovid. Sounded like it was pretty common. So that was
3.
▲
by
nanodeath
2y ago
I was amused they don't commit to either "full-stack" or "fullstack" spellings :)
4.
▲
by
nanodeath
2y ago
The HTML source is pretty good too. A doctype that's half HTML5, half XHTML. A pre-IE7 script tag thing. A meta-keywords tag. Lists that don't actually use any list tags. Raw PHP tags being dumped into the HTML output. No closing
5.
▲
by
nanodeath
3y ago
I _think_ what they're saying is a specialized/curried function that takes a single argument is better than the method it's replacing that takes three strings or whatever. That is, `foo.a("a").b("b").c(&qu
6.
▲
by
nanodeath
4y ago
Chrome desktop, too. Fun.
7.
▲
by
nanodeath
5y ago
Isn't the first word of the article a link to the tool? Maybe it was added after your comment.
8.
▲
by
nanodeath
5y ago
Kurzgesagt has a video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzkD5SeuwzM
9.
▲
by
nanodeath
5y ago
> If the value was in your L1 cache the difference in access time is 100 ns vs 1 ms which is an order of magnitude faster. I see this mistake all the time, even in print! It's millis -> micros -> nanos, so...that's a lot
10.
▲
by
nanodeath
5y ago
Similarly I thought of Death Stranding :) Though I guess exoskeletons are not uncommon in sci-fi.
11.
▲
by
nanodeath
5y ago
> "pull this pin to drop lava on the knight" that you see advertised on Facebook Not at all your point, of course, but someone got fed up with those ads and actually made the game depicted: https://www.theactualgame.
12.
▲
by
nanodeath
6y ago
IIRC one of Chrome's various selling points when it launched was that Flash was bundled in, so 1. you always had Flash and 2. the plugin was more likely to be properly compatible with the browser, and 3. because Chrome updated constant
13.
▲
by
nanodeath
6y ago
Hm...it's unclear whether you read the stream. They had reason to believe that the C-hook would fail after 97-100 years, yet weren't even checking the C-hooks on towers that were 100 years old. That seems willfully negligent.
14.
▲
by
nanodeath
6y ago
I can't tell if this is a troll comment. The article makes no mention of hydroxychloroquine.
15.
▲
by
nanodeath
7y ago
Pretty sure there are places online where you can sell/exchange gift cards.
16.
▲
by
nanodeath
8y ago
You might also be interested in Buycott.
17.
▲
Where ‘Yes to Affordable Groceries’ Really Means No to a Soda Tax
(nytimes.com)
4 points
by
nanodeath
8y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
nanodeath
8y ago
Yeah...maybe. It sounds like a huge very-custom engine. Easily could be faster to start over using Unreal or Unity.
19.
▲
“The End” – Limit Theory shuts down after six years of solo development
(kickstarter.com)
4 points
by
nanodeath
8y ago
|
2 comments
20.
▲
by
nanodeath
8y ago
> package signing and verification You're the first person I've seen mention this, which seems like it should be the first and most obvious line of defense against bad stuff like this. +1
21.
▲
by
nanodeath
8y ago
Eh, I had a similar problem. I'm low on disk space on C:, but it was able to download the update to C: + E: (E: is a partition on the same drive). Partway through installing the update, it asks me to "insert" disk E, which ob
22.
▲
by
nanodeath
8y ago
The Old Reader[1] has been my go-to. Looks similar. [1] https://theoldreader.com/
23.
▲
by
nanodeath
9y ago
Well, that's just part of their YouTube Red service they're trying to sell.
24.
▲
by
nanodeath
9y ago
Kinda...but you want 77 - 32 (which is 45).
25.
▲
by
nanodeath
9y ago
13th has a bit on ALEC, or here's a clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buO1KubTfQo
26.
▲
by
nanodeath
9y ago
"double overhead"?
27.
▲
Google ends support for popular browser benchmark because devs kept cheating it
(theverge.com)
2 points
by
nanodeath
9y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
by
nanodeath
9y ago
Community version of IntelliJ works just fine for Kotlin development.
29.
▲
by
nanodeath
10y ago
$57.99. But they were also pretty cheap in December, I think -- see https://camelcamelcamel.com/Instant-Pot-IP-DUO60-Multi-Funct... .
30.
▲
by
nanodeath
10y ago
Guessing "hostile" was intended.
More ›