nanark

34 ms·

1.
by nanark 6mo ago
Amazing!
2.
by nanark 11mo ago
Awesome. The default dev loop was brutal, and it feels you completely fixed it. I am going to try it soon. Feels like what OpenAI should've shipped in the first place.
3.
The case for the return of fine-tuning(welovesota.com)
167 points by nanark 11mo ago|81 comments
4.
Anthropic 80% AI-Coding Stunt: Clever, Probably True – But Not That Relevant(kevinkuipers.substack.com)
3 points by nanark 1y ago|0 comments
5.
AI Coding at a Crossroads: Disposable Code Editors and Flawed Benchmarks(kevinkuipers.substack.com)
2 points by nanark 1y ago|0 comments
6.
by nanark 1y ago
(author here) in a way, yes. you can see how I start with a god-mode euphoria, and slowly realise the vibe is mostly for boilerplates, and very (very) basic tasks. "I freestyled with absolutely zero planification, and I'm paying t
7.
by nanark 1y ago
it's in Hongdae ("Hongdae T Stay" on Booking). I paid ₩39,000 a night (~23 euros) with a 25 day stay. I don't think people stay long there, it was mostly foreigners. The bed is like a plank, there is no window. But it wa
8.
by nanark 1y ago
> Once you do that, then it is not "vibe coding". ok :)
9.
by nanark 1y ago
tbh, it could be a breakthrough in model design, an smart optimization (like the recent DeepConf paper), a more brute force (like the recent CodeMonkeys paper), or a completely new paradigm (at which point we won't even call it an LLM
10.
by nanark 1y ago
Funny how some people get triggered by this. If you read the whole thing, I actually explain how fucking dumb and clueless LLMs still are once you go past boilerplate. You basically need to keep them in check constantly, even for a pet proj
11.
by nanark 1y ago
I don't think VCs are out of reach. But hey, when It happens, I'll do something else.
12.
by nanark 1y ago
(Author here) Maybe you missed the point of what I wrote. I thought the disclaimer made it clear this is just a tiny project for 3 users only and not something meant to scale :) Is my product inferior to Notion, Slack, etc.? OF COURSE. Do I
13.
by nanark 1y ago
I've been in the game for over 25 years and built plenty of architectures with over millions of MAU, so I am not super anxious about what I've built here. But any API I use can be breached. I would say the risk I take is about the
14.
by nanark 1y ago
hey (author here). obviously, the rest of the content adds a lot of nuance to this statement. it's a bit provocative on purpose. But in practice, now that I am working with it, what I needed from those tools already works, with no majo
15.
by nanark 1y ago
wow. on my todo. thanks!
16.
by nanark 1y ago
tbh, it's an addiction, can't wait to have a good voice-to-vibecode
17.
by nanark 1y ago
<3
18.
Raw notes from reading this wonderful essay from Gurwinder(libidosciendi.substack.com)
1 points by nanark 1y ago|0 comments
19.
by nanark 1y ago
Great content!
20.
Receiver 2 is an amazing and disturbing FPS(nanark.medium.com)
4 points by nanark 5y ago|1 comments
21.
by nanark 5y ago
I believe the game is still very unknown to many PC players, and it’s a pity as it deserves so much more recognition for the very unique experience it delivers. Therefore I decided to write a very late review (the game was released a year p
22.
From modder to game developer, Brian’s tribute to the simulations of the ‘90s(nanark.medium.com)
4 points by nanark 6y ago|1 comments
23.
by nanark 6y ago
A story about fighter aircrafts, space ships, game design, modding and programming, with a pinch of nostalgia.