namnatulco

5 ms·

1.
by namnatulco 11y ago
"hidden" here refers to not visible to the communication partners (e.g., me and hackernews); my understanding is that government access should remain hidden to the immediate communication partners in this way. However, it should r
2.
by namnatulco 12y ago
And here's the problem: all of them are mutually incompatible in most situations. Even moving .tex documents over different platforms is an enormous pain, and pdflatex/xelatex don't possess the error reporting you need to qui
3.
by namnatulco 12y ago
Intriguing concept, but I have some doubts about its security, considering there isn't any kind of security proof at all. I'm not really an expert in zero knowledge proofs, but what I've been taught about them raises some que
4.
by namnatulco 12y ago
No, I'm saying that AI has wider applications, and I was responding to the manned flight safety example. Also, I'm arguing that we shouldn't dismiss the guy's arguments just because he's an ass. Especially with rega
5.
by namnatulco 12y ago
IPS for cars. Interesting, considering that most discussions I've had with people working on automotive security point to the fact that it's basically impossible to do due to the large amount of proprietary communication built on
6.
by namnatulco 12y ago
I think it's far more interesting and productive to use facebook posts for this, rather than GPS coordinates in EXIF data and comparing it with a phone book (which is essentially what they're doing, according to the about page). F
7.
by namnatulco 12y ago
This seems like intended behavior -- the assumption on Twitter's part is that when you're setting your account to protected, you're also going to clean out the list of followers you have. I guess it'd be an improvement i
8.
by namnatulco 12y ago
Are you really trying to deny that google cars and other automated systems at least partially based on AI have safety issues? Even if we're talking autonomous, "life-like" AI, there is a long list of interesting philosophical