naman34

6 ms·

1.
by naman34 2y ago
C# is a faster Java.
2.
by naman34 2y ago
That second things is a typo.
3.
by naman34 2y ago
swift-wasm exists
4.
by naman34 2y ago
The feature exists, but it’s not so easy because there is a lack of documentation.
5.
by naman34 2y ago
Good to know. It’s an old blog and I’ll be moving it away soon. This just makes that work more urgent for me.
6.
by naman34 2y ago
Seift has great C, C++ and Rust interop. And despite Swift for Tensorflow being killed, there’s still decent python interop. Now, setting up a project for that is probably quite hard because the documentation is non-existent.
7.
by naman34 2y ago
There’s lots of interesting ideas in languages but most of them fail to be mainstream at all. When comparing new languages at the level of Rust, Swift, Go and maybe Kotlin are the only real competitors.
8.
by naman34 2y ago
Sadly, Swift also produces large binaries unless you use Embedded Swift which is still early.
9.
by naman34 2y ago
The documentation uses “copied” for value types that are copy-on-write. The documentation has oversimplified a bunch of the mental model and it causes incorrect understanding. Swift’s documentation is quite bad TBH. The biggest thing that s
10.
by naman34 2y ago
And that article is from 2020. A lot has changed since.
11.
by naman34 2y ago
I added a new section to the post with links and information to dispel this myth that Swift is only for Apple platforms.
12.
by naman34 2y ago
Saw the talk announcing Rise in person and it was very impressive and seems like a pragmatic approach to server-driven UI. It’s server components without the wait.
13.
by naman34 3y ago
https://stylexjs.com/docs/learn/styling-ui/defining-styles/#...
14.
by naman34 3y ago
We're solving the performance pitfall of CSS-in-JS libraries by making a compiler instead. In the vast majority of cases, there should be zero runtime cost to using StyleX.
15.
by naman34 3y ago
Griffel and StyleX arrived at very similar ideas and we've discussed the possibility of sharing more code between the two. There are some meaningful differences in the API choices, but the high-level design is pretty much the same.
16.
by naman34 3y ago
Hey! I'm the maintainer of StyleX and I just wanted to say that you would probably like PandaCSS or Tamagui. We don't think the Tailwind way of styling is readable in the long term, but we see the value is being able to author tha
17.
by naman34 3y ago
Hey! We support dynamic styles, too. We're continuing to work on optimisations for StyleX, and I'll be looking at Tamagui for inspiration!
18.
by naman34 3y ago
StyleX supports this pattern. You can export a bunch of styles in one file and then import and use them in another. You can import many different styles and apply them conditionally etc. Also, completely dynamic styles are supported. We wer
19.
by naman34 11y ago
Thanks WA. Autocorrect can still bite you! I agree that it is tough to compete with twitter. They have money and a huge reach. Periscope will probably get some advantage when it comes to integration with Twitter. But there are also downside
20.
by naman34 11y ago
Hi Tim, video streaming usually needs a good internet connection. But with upclose, you should still be able to stream reliably to people near you, as we use a peer-to-peer streaming solution.
21.
by naman34 11y ago
Disclaimer: I work for upclose.me I think Periscope is great. Other than the nice logo, Meerkat was always very rough around the edges, Periscope actually looks very nice in comparison. It also has less latency. We are obviously looking at
22.
Going semi-colon-less(blog.namangoel.com)
4 points by naman34 12y ago|0 comments