n0on3

6 ms·

1.
by n0on3 11d ago
That’s insane. Thank you for the service you provide.
2.
by n0on3 27d ago
> _An intelligent person can convince themselves of anything_ I think it might be just the opposite: convincing yourself of things relies on exploiting limits for which very intelligent people have much higher threshold they might as wel
3.
by n0on3 2mo ago
I get the point of the article and it resonates with my general tendency to support more openness, but older and more cynical me wonders how much of this is a battle worth fighting or a self-serving argument from an harness developer. I mea
4.
by n0on3 2mo ago
You mean like… some sort of code?
5.
IronCurtain – A secure* runtime for autonomous AI agents(github.com)
2 points by n0on3 2mo ago|0 comments
6.
by n0on3 2mo ago
“the most powerful AI agent file-editing tool in the world […] patent-pending”… tl;dr: turn tool calls into more structured loops, give it some fancy name and slop about it https://hic-ai.com/blog/tool-response-engineer
7.
by n0on3 3mo ago
Seems cool from the docs page, I was about to give it a shot but https://github.com/vlm-run/mm goes 404 …
8.
by n0on3 3mo ago
Apparently nobody cares. A few days ago I bumped-into and submitted this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48655747 . I thought given the general trust people seem to place in media files it would have raised a few eyeb
9.
PixelSmash – FFmpeg's MagicYUV decoder vuln leads to RCE via media file(jfrog.com)
10 points by n0on3 3mo ago|1 comments
10.
by n0on3 3mo ago
I second the sentiment, it’s unbelievably annoying. Even more so when the suggested solution from the “support” appears to be “You can downgrade to a version before we introduced this bug”. I’m not even gonna try switching to that new crapw
11.
by n0on3 3mo ago
Sure, but #80 out of 190, still not great ain’t it?
12.
by n0on3 4mo ago
Oh boy, this did not age well. Most cases of “extremely successful” people I can think of exhibit the opposite of these core principles: have no “knack” whatsoever, except not giving a shit about whatever they pretend to be their focus whil
13.
by n0on3 4mo ago
Except most of the complexity has nothing to do with “understanding and exploring the universe”, it’s just byproduct of the ever changing fractal composition of attempts to gain or obtain something over someone else.
14.
by n0on3 5mo ago
> humans would see that the quoted significance makes no sense I wonder how long that will last
15.
by n0on3 6mo ago
Would you be aware of it if that was the case? I don’t mean this to be hostile or anything but the senario in which one does not notice himself and it goes unnoticed or silently accepted externally does not seem too far fetched to me.
16.
by n0on3 2y ago
Their results are simply not reliable. The matching approach often matches too many things (hey, this could be A or B or C or D or E or F ...or 42!), or picks up things that have nothing to do with the license of some target (hello randomly
17.
by n0on3 3y ago
None taken! I think you misunderstood what I was trying to contribute though, since I was not attempting to celebrate anything nor to emphasize on traditions. I was just saying those "goals" have well known solutions that differs
18.
by n0on3 3y ago
As an italian who is told he's pretty good at cooking, some of this is on point but a few things sound "wrong" to me (I use quotes because there's really no objective way to do this literally right or wrong, I'm jus
19.
by n0on3 3y ago
> Why would they use 0days on security researchers. My guess is it's a test with upside Or just be after the accesses the targets have...
20.
by n0on3 3y ago
> how they determined this project is linked to NK hackers If they have enough confidence to attribute and not disclose how/why, one can fairly guess they don't want to burn sources or indicators which might still be useful mov
21.
by n0on3 3y ago
+1
22.
by n0on3 3y ago
(I'm not sure if you were joking or not and I know it's probably not in the same spirit you intended it here / a bit OT but...) I've been using literally that exact expression for a while to describe the situation in whi
23.
by n0on3 3y ago
I am not quite sure what this says about me but I LMAO looking at this one, thanks
24.
by n0on3 4y ago
eheh, so much this. I was about to comment in a less sarcastic way but essentially the same thing. I mean, we'll be just fine installing vim and make it the default as needed, I'm not so sure about those raised with the "it h
25.
by n0on3 4y ago
I see what you did there
26.
by n0on3 4y ago
Plenty of good suggestions here, I don't have another one to add, let alone a better one. But I'll tell you this: you are not alone, this happens (a lot) and odds are it is not your fault. You asked how to deal with it, a lot of t
27.
by n0on3 4y ago
What they are doing is giving users an easy-to-use option to sacrifice part of the default user experience to enhance security by disabling features that are common vectors (which happen to be used by, as they phrase it multiple times in th
28.
by n0on3 4y ago
This. So much this. In so many fields, it's actually hard to find one where this is not the case.
29.
by n0on3 5y ago
many sort-of-recent home network equipment support this stuff or equivalent (i.e., multiple networks) just as a configuration from their admin UI. You don't really need relevant experience to set this up, just very basic networking kno
30.
by n0on3 5y ago
I think we already know how to build secure tech, we just don't because of the cost, which is not 2x or 10x but way higher to the point that is deemed not worth/feasible both for private companies and governments, so it affects ev

More ›