mythrowaway0

25 ms·

1.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
Speaks for not being able to find the charging point in the parking lot, perhaps? Don't forget that Musk formulated his assertion of Broder's motivation based on a data log of the car traveling between 5mph and 15mph for 0.6 miles. That sou
2.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
> I'm not sure what a reviewer driving in circles at a charging station proves? Perhaps that he couldn't find it, since it was his first visit? Based on the rest of this thread, though, Occam is not going to be making an appearance and
3.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
...or trying to find the charging point, since it was potentially his first visit there? While we're speculating on rationale, why don't we include possibilities fair to both sides?
4.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
Indeed, one of its finest defeats. Vietnam was extremely complicated, both on the battlefield and off, and it's not my area of expertise; that being said, a lot of modern maneuvers planted their seeds in that soil. Americans grew tired of I
5.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
No, you're on point, in my opinion. And yes, you're correct, what we're seeing today in Iraq and Afghanistan is simply the extreme evolution of maneuver warfare. There's no delicate way to say this, so: it's pretty clear that 'terrorism' is
6.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
Notice how your quote includes the phrase "large-scale" behind it? That's because of what I, you know, wrote in my original comment about maneuver warfare not implying a certain scale or strategy in particular. You're proving my point and d
7.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
Very much so. There's a study of 1MD in Iraqi Freedom specifically here[1]. [1]: http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,NI_WAR_0104,00.ht...
8.
by mythrowaway0 14y ago
There's a bibliography near the end with interesting things to read. That's generally where things to read if you're interested in a topic will appear, and there's no need to be harsh to the guy pointing you toward useful information. No am