Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mustaphah
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mustaphah
15d ago
I don't like Ed, but it seems that Luu spends far more attention documenting failed predictions than checking other predictions that might have been correct.
2.
▲
The Little Book of Reinforcement Learning
(github.com)
213 points
by
mustaphah
2mo ago
|
26 comments
3.
▲
Opportunity cost neglect (2009) [pdf]
(bear.warrington.ufl.edu)
2 points
by
mustaphah
2mo ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren (1931)
(fermatslibrary.com)
4 points
by
mustaphah
2mo ago
|
1 comments
5.
▲
A field guide to Fable: finding your unknowns
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
|
1 comments
6.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
Haidt, in his great book "The Righteous Mind," has been arguing that reasoning evolved not to discover truth but to win arguments. There's a lot of scientific research backing his idea. Haidt's metaphor is the rider and
7.
▲
Ten Takeaways from the AI Engineering Report 2026: The Acceleration Whiplash
(faros.ai)
2 points
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
The cost YAGNI was never about
(newsletter.kentbeck.com)
6 points
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
|
1 comments
9.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
You can probably catch a big pie of those with simple heuristics to flag suspicious repos for expensive review (human- or AI-based). I did that with public account & repo data, and I believe they can do much more given the amount of pr
10.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
Well, my trend detection logic rewards recent stars more than older ones [1]. Recency is an important factor for many custom and public tools that track GitHub trends. I think the bad guys intentionally recreate repos - I actually noticed t
11.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
This is just one flavour of abuse. GitHub does NOT give a shit about the scale of the malware problem. I've seen so many forms of malware repos working on a GitHub trends newsletter [1], mostly about crypto, NFTs, KMS, and similar stuf
12.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
You want my email voluntarily for the whole purpose of telling me "Hey, Fable is back"? Everyone would be screaming the moment that happens. No, Thanks!
13.
▲
Writing code vs. shipping code [pdf]
(nber.org)
3 points
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Trust Factory
(newsletter.kentbeck.com)
7 points
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
I finished The Lean Startup a few days ago, and I really felt the power of the ideas you've shared there coming from a heavily technical background; incredible work. It's already been 14+ years since you wrote the book; I wonder i
16.
▲
by
mustaphah
3mo ago
You would probably be better off reading learnxinyminutes.com/zig/
17.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
I have a strong feeling the whole thing is distracting the people - the real question is, distracting from what?
18.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Sam Altman and other big figures tend to shape their narratives around their personal and organizational interests. When people were skeptical, they pushed hard into the "God-like AI" narrative. Now that safety concerns are growin
19.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
I hate to say it, but I'm becoming less and less interested in structured content, and more interested in disorganized, messy content over time. I don't like the thought of how this may end up in a few years for me.
20.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
"AI bubble" in the title, count me in.
21.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Tokenmaxxing is so dumb. You should never show your team how exactly you're measuring their performance; people will optimize for the metric, not the actual performance. Classic Goodhart’s Law: when a measure becomes a target, it cease
22.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Feels like they are debating internally whether to cut people or AI spending. Very healthy debate. Let's hope they spare people.
23.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Can't locate the link to the actual speech
24.
▲
LLMs pass a standard three-party Turing test
(pnas.org)
3 points
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
|
1 comments
25.
▲
The small sample trap in A/B testing
(hadid.dev)
4 points
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
|
1 comments
26.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
> I'm not convinced he's all that smart We probably disagree on the meaning of "smartness"
27.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Couldn't tolerate the content; it's too structured; I'm open to something more chaotic.
28.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
Extreme smartness has its own failure modes
29.
▲
by
mustaphah
4mo ago
The strongest evidence against Musk was Musk. His own 2017 emails supporting for-profit chats made the "betrayal" narrative very hard to sell.
30.
▲
by
mustaphah
6mo ago
Maybe this explain it: https://www.psypost.org/scientists-just-discovered-that-a-hi...
More ›