mulr00ney

7 ms·

1.
by mulr00ney 2mo ago
"I have actually heard otherwise intelligent people say things just like that" I think that is the indicator.
2.
by mulr00ney 3mo ago
If vibey readmes are for LLMs like the other comments suggest, they should be banished to a folder where it's clear they're just for a robot so I don't have to look at them. The README.md can actually be a reserved space for
3.
by mulr00ney 3mo ago
How so?
4.
by mulr00ney 3mo ago
Seems to be hijacked the video of some game they generated. :(
5.
by mulr00ney 4mo ago
> You go to a university because you are deeply interested in understanding the subject that you study. Doing the homework and the tests are just the "goalposts" to check for yourself whether you made progress on this. I think
6.
by mulr00ney 4mo ago
Yeah, it's 100% the better term. We've got rules against using engineer here in Canada though several companies I've worked for have called me an engineer. Apparently Professional Engineers Ontario sometimes goes after peop
7.
by mulr00ney 4mo ago
Engineers versus "engineers". I have fond memories of a boss who was an actual, licensed engineer while the rest of us were very much normal software devs. Boss was pretty chill except when someone someone suggested we should be
8.
by mulr00ney 4mo ago
>is bad for the environment, is bad for society Can't it be those too?
9.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
Downvoted because I was flippant about the American comment (because it was _insane_)
10.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
>It is not up to you to deprive anyone their right to use them. Why is it a right? >Are you going to go after car cameras next? No. A car cannot follow me into a building very easily. It cannot turn as quickly as a human head. >Any
11.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
I think the `e` looks better in the 'real pixels' example they gave; I find my tends to 'fill in' the space of the top part of the letter, and I suspect in the context of a longer sentence it'd be pretty easy to par
12.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
> And when the EU/Australia/China.. tries to regulate punish those corps, suddenly everyone comes out on HN to explain protectionism, overreach, some -ism, and "actually we need to give them the benefit of the doubt"
13.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
> if you edit those [LLM tropes] out, or ignore them, you can’t really argue that the writing produced by these models is objectively ‘bad’ any more. > or ignore them If you ignore the bad thing then the bad thing is good. What the fu
14.
by mulr00ney 5mo ago
> Unfortunately many believe they can, and it is impossible to disprove. So now real people need to write avoiding certain styles, because a lot of other people have decided those are "LLM clues." Bullets, EM Dash, certain comm
15.
by mulr00ney 6mo ago
>I don’t want more “leverage to build and ship”, I want to live in a world where people aren’t so disconnected from reality and so lonely they have romantic relationships with a chat window; where they don’t turn off their brains and acc
16.
by mulr00ney 6mo ago
>The time saved matters, but the real unlock was the mental overhead removed. Every PR used to be a small context switch: stop thinking about the code, start thinking about how to describe the code. Now I type /git-pr and move on to
17.
by mulr00ney 7mo ago
Go back to Linkedin.
18.
by mulr00ney 8mo ago
>Like...jesus, I expected more/better from folks who digest mathematical proofs and Arxiv papers for funsies, yet so many people here just cannot think critically about complex issues that involve people other than themselves. Peopl
19.
by mulr00ney 8mo ago
>No one reads books for entertainment anymore, because paper is an inferior entertainment platform There are more forms of entertainment and people have diversified how they spend their leisure time. I don't think that it necessaril
20.
by mulr00ney 9mo ago
> Esquire writing is so weird. It’s genuinely like a relic from another age. I agree: but to me that's at least something kind of interesting and evocative, even if it's a trainwreck. (In fact, it might even be better when it&#
21.
by mulr00ney 9mo ago
Had CI fail a few times this morning pulling stuff from repos. Seems to have resolved. EDIT: Nevermind, it's still having issues EDIT 2: Now showing as "We are investigating a rise in request failures on several services" on
22.
by mulr00ney 9mo ago
> The question is I don't mean to be a dick, but no, the question was what is a reasonable cause to bash someone if it's not disliking what they do. I don't know if these weird Socratic replies are meant to be thoughtful b
23.
by mulr00ney 9mo ago
What would be a resaonable cause to bash them, in your view, if not disliking what they do? I don't think we should hate them or show them hatred. I don't think that if you're working at a company that's suppressing some
24.
by mulr00ney 1y ago
Thanks for the insight - learned something here. Didn't know about the hacker, that's pretty upsetting.
25.
by mulr00ney 1y ago
> In fact, not only protestors but people who donated to the protest got their bank accounts seized. As far as I can tell accounts were frozen, not seized. Do you have a reference for donor accounts being seized? ref: https://
26.
by mulr00ney 3y ago
Bizarre takeaway. AIM and MSN had the option to block people 20 years ago and I'm pretty sure IRC had it even before that. It's not a new concept.