mudsnail

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mudsnail 6y ago

   What would you think about a deep fake depicting secret video footage (from a cell phone) of real climate scientists at at a real conference discussing how they are manipulating the data to convince the public and the lawmakers that climate
2. 2.▲
   by mudsnail 6y ago

   Or maybe instead of throwing more money at the problem we can face up to the fact that our democratic system is broken. That these institutions have been politicized over the years and are being run by people who are good at playing the gam
3. 3.▲
   by mudsnail 6y ago

   But you didn't answer the parents questions. How far back do you go? Humans and the societies they create have been doing horrible things to each other since they existed. Personally, I have ancestors on both sides of colonial history.
4. 4.▲
   by mudsnail 7y ago

   Haven't looked at the original study, but from the article >>>In terms of the actual difference eating 2 servings a week would make to an individual's baseline risk of CVD, the researchers calculated: processed meat: you
5. 5.▲
   by mudsnail 7y ago

   Those numbers are assuming 2 servings per week. How many meat eater limits themselves to that few of servings?
6. 6.▲
   by mudsnail 7y ago

   You should really include that this was under the assumption of only 2 servings a week, where a serving is about 3.5 ounces. I wonder how the rates change when you assume 2 servings per meal, which seems more in line with peoples actual die