mudbutt

8 ms·

1.
by mudbutt 9y ago
Google abandons open source projects all the time, I don't see how that is a strong argument. Facebook actually uses React, IMO Angular 2+ was built for the sole purpose of consulting, thus more breaking changes and magic DSL.
2.
by mudbutt 9y ago
I code in Ruby everyday and I think JS is a far superior language. Javascript has closures, modules and hoisting that complies and stores functions and variables before executing. In Ruby code starts executing before everything is initializ
3.
by mudbutt 9y ago
I would argue that it is by far the worst Framework one could possibly choose.
4.
by mudbutt 9y ago
It drives me crazy when I hear things like Angular4+ is better for "Large Ambitious Applications with large teams" when in reality Angular4 suffers from the same slow down/performance problems as Angular 1.x. https:/&#x
5.
by mudbutt 9y ago
Yeah when I first saw the headline an image of a Chinese Erlich Bachman sprang to mind. Although the absurdity of the whole thing is pretty humorous for some reason it made me sad. dunno why.
6.
by mudbutt 9y ago
I think it's the fact LinkedIn uses Ember. Anything built with Ember is sluggish and bloated
7.
by mudbutt 10y ago
I can't imagine any smart developers using Ruby anyone, I know because I unfortunately work with Rails and anyone with a brain cell has already left. To me deciding to use Rails isn't a very smart decision
8.
by mudbutt 10y ago
Sorry for being an idiot, but when you reducers you don't mean the native .reduce do you?
9.
by mudbutt 10y ago
Finding bugs for something you wrote yourself is easy because you WROTE it and can easily reason about what each method does, what data/methods does it have access to etc. etc. Anyways, I unfortunately work with Rails and I hate it. To