mtrojnar

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mtrojnar 15y ago

   Did you really want to discuss your results "ahead of time"? You could easily do it before publishing them. My email address is in the manual of stunnel. I could argue whether an old Ubuntu package is "out of the box" stunnel, or whether s
2. 2.▲
   by mtrojnar 15y ago

   1. It's you who started the flame by publishing your obviously unfair comparison. 2. I didn't receive your email (if you really sent it). 3. Stunnel overrides the OpenSSL default of enabling compression by default since version 4.51 release
3. 3.▲
   by mtrojnar 15y ago

   Testing results indicated that stunnel was much faster than the line speed (and thus faster than his own product), but the author simply ignored it. In fact his version of stunnel had DEFLATE/ZLIB compression enabled by default. In order t
4. 4.▲
   by mtrojnar 15y ago

   Real SSL clients are supposed to use SSL session resumption. Benchmarking with a client that only negotiates new sessions hardly reflects real-life usage.