mshark

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mshark 6mo ago

   Hadn’t seen Traycer, that looks really polished. An important difference is that eforge is open source (Apache 2.0). I purposefully left out planning features from eforge because I don’t want the same tool that builds my code to force me in
2. 2.▲
   by mshark 6mo ago

   Had the same realization which inspired eforge (shameless plug) https://github.com/eforge-build/eforge - planning stays in the developer’s control with all engineering (agent orchestration) handed off to eforge. This h
3. 3.▲
   Show HN: Eforge – An Agentic Build System(github.com)

   3 points by mshark 6mo ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   Ask HN: Pointers for designing a programming club curriculum

   2 points by mshark 8y ago|1 comments
5. 5.▲
   by mshark 12y ago

   Just this week I started learning org-mode by reading one of Charle Cave's postings on how uses org-mode to implement the Getting Things Done methodology http://members.optusnet.com.au/~charles57/GTD/gtd_workf
6. 6.▲
   by mshark 12y ago

   You should have a section in your README discussing differences from D3. I've used D3 a little and understand some of the pain points. Looking at your library I'm asking myself "why would I abandon D3 for this?".