mschae23

7 ms·

1.
by mschae23 8mo ago
That depends on your interpretation of what a “derivative work” constitutes, which the EUPL delegates to copyright law. For the GPL, it includes other programs linked to the work (which is how it affects other projects using the work as a l
2.
by mschae23 8mo ago
The EUPL is a fine license, especially if your goal is wide compatibility with other copyleft licenses. However, that compatibility also weakens its own copyleft, which could be surprising if you just read the main text. Also, the GPL is no
3.
by mschae23 2y ago
It hasn't failed. Not if you do what crowdsourcing requires and suggest a better replacement. I agree that "Solving 2D geometry puzzles using 3D reasoning" does not fit the actual topic of the video, so I have replaced it wit
4.
by mschae23 2y ago
Vandalism on Fandom wikis is counter-productive. It just makes it look more active, to both users and search engines, and so will in turn make it harder for people to find the independent wiki. The best thing to do is just to ignore abandon
5.
by mschae23 2y ago
They explain that without it, they can't effectively enforce the copyrights on their projects: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html.en I highly doubt that the FSF, who developed the GPL licenses and value
6.
by mschae23 2y ago
> Math B seems, in contrast, beyond me. There is a programming analogy: Math B is like Haskell, or pure functional programming, which also is as ungraspable to me. This is not just an analogy – Haskell (or pure functional programming in
7.
by mschae23 3y ago
The Minecraft wiki was always (and still is) using MediaWiki.