mpenet

8 ms·

1.
by mpenet 6mo ago
If you use clojure-mcp/clojure-mcp-light that problem goes away, and that gives it the ability to run a repl and work from it directly. It’s night and day.
2.
by mpenet 11mo ago
Thanks! Long time lurker indeed. I also forgot the very solid ClojureDart.
3.
by mpenet 11mo ago
Clojure will be around as long as the jvm. It’s mostly done at the core level, most updates are to leverage new host features nowadays. The rest is happily provided at the library level by the community (which is still very prolific). And
4.
by mpenet 1y ago
And not enclosed
5.
Editor Code Assistant (ECA)(github.com)
13 points by mpenet 1y ago|1 comments
6.
by mpenet 1y ago
Editor Code Assistant (ECA) - AI pair programming capabilities agnostic of editor
7.
by mpenet 1y ago
That’s quite common, it means they host the control plane for free but not the kubelets (worker nodes).
8.
by mpenet 1y ago
If there’s any hardware issue on your dedicated box it might take a lot of time until your box gets back up (hours, days…). On a vps it’s less likely to happen in the first place (hvs are usually better quality) and if that happens migratio
9.
by mpenet 2y ago
That doesn't work well in some conditions, it's not new either. Some cruise missiles that have TFR (Terrain-following radar) and actually do this already. It also is not really applicable when you are on a balistic course at *ver
10.
by mpenet 2y ago
That. However that works just fine for ICBMs and the like… The future is more likely to be quantum accelerometers and quantum gyroscopes, as they have no “external dependency”.
11.
by mpenet 2y ago
There are plenty of very ergonomic languages on the JVM (for instance clojure). I wouldn’t dismiss the JVM as a whole, it is a marvel of engineering and is evolving quickly nowadays (see loom, panama, leyden, etc…).
12.
by mpenet 2y ago
My dad used to work on certifying, servicing and making custom instruments for planes, subs, prototypes of all kinds of that era (60s to mid-90s). His “lab” was basically all about testing and simulating environments for the instruments. He
13.
by mpenet 3y ago
Because it’s an extra runtime check vs a direct lua call
14.
by mpenet 3y ago
Yeah it’s quite personal at this point. I have used both but I am way more efficient with emacs. I also find the investment in emacs pays back more over time. Generally I also find emacs a lot more snappy. But that’s just me, and to be fai
15.
by mpenet 3y ago
There’s vterm nowadays
16.
by mpenet 3y ago
consult-grep (and it’s variants using git or rg etc) let you do that, with results as you type in mini buffer, with full live previews in a separate buffer (if you want). With an extra keystroke you can export all the results in a buffer an
17.
by mpenet 3y ago
It’s quite easy to have non trivial, reproducible configs on a single file nowadays (ex using straight/use-package). The rare times I needed to use emacs on a remote server with my config my full blow setup is a copy/paste, or cu
18.
by mpenet 3y ago
Same. It really was the best screen size/ratio for me. I was basically carrying it everywhere.
19.
by mpenet 4y ago
'ish. datahike would be the closest to datomic in terms of features/implementation (support for as-of, transactor etc). Then in terms of maturity I think the choice is between xtdb and datascript, both are very solid/maintain