Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mpais
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mpais
2mo ago
Shameless plug, SQZ does just that, you can check it out at https://github.com/MarcioPais/SQZ Also for some discussion on more technical aspects and sample images, check out the thread over at the Encode Forum: https:
2.
▲
by
mpais
3y ago
> What environments do you see this benefiting? Anywhere where you have visual content that needs to be "consumed" in a large variety of possible viewings conditions, from low to extremelly high DPI 5 or 6-inch smartphone scree
3.
▲
by
mpais
3y ago
The codec is extremely simple (hence why it's relatively fast even with such unoptimized code) and as such doesn't even use any entropy coding backend, which is what allows for the incredible scalability. Now, obviously, that mean
4.
▲
by
mpais
3y ago
> Lossless ones are basically just ZIP Lossless image compression is a vast field with myriad different requirements and solutions, and generalizing like that is just plain wrong. Most lossless image codecs for photographic or similar re
5.
▲
Show HN: SQZ – Low complexity, scalable lossy to lossless image compression
(github.com)
7 points
by
mpais
3y ago
|
4 comments
6.
▲
by
mpais
4y ago
QOI is not on the pareto frontier for compression [1], it is however extremely simple and is a nice introduction to data compression for anyone wanting to learn about the field. [1] See: https://www.lucaversari.it/FJXL_and_F
7.
▲
by
mpais
5y ago
paq8px v206 [1] with option "-8art" compresses it to 9,145 bytes using ~2GB of memory in 82s, mostly due to a better pre-training stage. [1] https://github.com/hxim/paq8px
8.
▲
by
mpais
7y ago
Some RAW formats are pre-compressed, usually with very simple (hence fast) algorithms, and some aren't even lossless (Sony ARW). It's often possible to further compress them with specialized tools. Disclosure: I'm the author
9.
▲
by
mpais
7y ago
"his relatively simple LSTM-based neural net compressor is 10x faster than one of the more complex state of the art algorithms while delivering comparable compression ratios." No, it's 10x faster than an experimental, complet