mp5

5 ms·

1.
by mp5 1y ago
Yup, just rebased about a week ago
2.
by mp5 1y ago
If I understand your question correctly - Cline and Roo both display diffs by using built-in VS Code components, while Cursor/Windsurf/Void have built their own custom UI to display diffs. Very small detail, and just a matter of p
3.
by mp5 1y ago
Big fan of Continue btw! There's a small difference in how we handle inline edits - if you've used inline edits in Cursor/Windsurf/Void you'll notice that a box appears above the text you are selecting, and you can
4.
by mp5 1y ago
I really wonder why dynamic learning hasn't been explored more. It would be a huge moat for the labs (everyone would have to host and dynamically train their own model with a major lab). Seems like it would make the AI way smarter too.
5.
by mp5 1y ago
Local models just aren't there yet in terms of being able to host locally on your laptop without extra hardware. We're hoping that one of the big labs will distill an ~8B to ~32B parameter model that performs SOTA benchmarks! This
6.
by mp5 1y ago
This is a great suggestion. We're actually storing the input/output costs of most models, but aren't computing cost estimates yet. Definitely something to add. My only hesitation is that token-based cost estimates may not be
7.
by mp5 1y ago
You're right that extensions do manage fine - the main differences right now are UX improvements (many of them are mentioned above). I can see the differences compounding at some point which is why we're focused on the full IDE si
8.
by mp5 1y ago
The extensions API lets you control the sidebar, but you basically don't have control over anything in the editor. We wouldn't have been able to build our inline edit feature, or our navigation UI if we were an extension.
9.
by mp5 1y ago
Void actually launched before the Windsurf IDE existed! http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42127882 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41563958
10.
by mp5 1y ago
Thanks for the suggestions - these issues have been a bit painful for us, and we will probably fix them in the next major update to Void. Believe it or not, the logo similarity was actually unintentional, though I imagine there was subconsc
11.
by mp5 1y ago
This is a good question. Because we're open source, we will always allow you to host models locally for free, or use your own API key. This makes monetization a bit difficult in the short term. As with many devtool companies, the long-
12.
by mp5 1y ago
One of the founders here - Void will always remain open source! There are plenty of examples of an open source alternative finding its own niche (eg Supabase, Mattermost) and we don't see this being any different.
13.
by mp5 1y ago
We do have a linux build! (the link is at the bottom of the download page). Some systems are a bit finicky so we give more options on setting it up.
14.
by mp5 1y ago
We've been holding off on this until Void is out of Beta.
15.
by mp5 2y ago
We did a smaller launch a few days ago, but we've actually made a lot of changes to our github contributing page, website, logo since then (based on the feedback). Just trying to ship fast, haha.
16.
by mp5 2y ago
We plan on selling to enterprise companies. We know a lot of companies want to keep their repos private and so we offer them on-prem hosting options. Closed source tools can't really do this because they have to keep their prompt build
17.
by mp5 2y ago
Should be fixed now!
18.
by mp5 2y ago
One feature you could add is allowing the user to map changes in the concatenated file back to the original files. For example, if an LLM edits the concatenated file, I would want it to return the corresponding filenames and line numbers of