moussess

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by moussess 2y ago

   Of course I read it, opinion said “ At the same time, a law targeting a foreign adversary’s control over a communications platform is in many ways different in kind from the regulations of non-expressive activity that we have subjected to F
2. 2.▲
   by moussess 2y ago

   The Supreme Court with its unanimous decision made it very very clear it’s not about freedom of speech, but about foreign adversary having access to data profile of 180 million US citizens. And believe in lawmakers argument of foreign adver
3. 3.▲
   by moussess 2y ago

   Here is a list on what restrictions Chinese citizens live with - Workers in state sectors can be banned from traveling out of China https://www.scmp.com/news/article/3265503/chinas-expanding-t... . Also, non
4. 4.▲
   by moussess 2y ago

   US came out way ahead here. They gain full control of TikTok. They have a precedent now to ban apps from hostile power. They gained even more respect from countries that hate China/russia/iran, such as Taiwan, South Korea, Japan,
5. 5.▲
   by moussess 2y ago

   Great analysis! This comment should be the top post