morpunkee

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   This reversal was requested by Matz, who stated: I am sorry but I am confusing. As a non-native English speaker (and non-USA citizen), I have a hard time grasping the issue. Of course, I am against any kind of harassment but I am not
2. 2.▲
   Ruby reverted the controversial Code of Conduct changes(github.com)

   10 points by morpunkee 5y ago|3 comments
3. 3.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   Troll or not, he was supported by those people.
4. 4.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/...
5. 5.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   We don't know the nationality of this hmdne guy, possibly Arabic.
6. 6.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   In this sense, that they would help protect the community from trolls - yes they are defensible. But otherwise, I would unfortunately disagree. It's like an argument that we should lock everyone in cages, so they wouldn't hurt the
7. 7.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   Protected class is a programming term ;)
8. 8.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   Apparently this mailing list comment triggered this reaction: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/...
9. 9.▲
   by morpunkee 5y ago

   https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/pull/2691/files
10. 10.▲
    Ruby removed “Participants will be tolerant of opposing views” from its CoC(github.com)

    374 points by morpunkee 5y ago|552 comments