morpheos137

4 ms·

1.
by morpheos137 8d ago
We don't understand why? Reality is mathematical. As evidenced by lawful physics.
2.
by morpheos137 8d ago
The sphere of human comprehensible mathematics is finite. Once everything is solve it is not necessary to advance the field. The recurring error her is to say ai is not the product of human effort but another agent. Ai is human. Ai may well
3.
by morpheos137 11d ago
Arguably language itself I a cognitive bias.
4.
by morpheos137 11d ago
Someday. It is has to do with degrees of freedom and information encoding in terms. Stop assuming operations are external but consider them as relational degrees of freedom of a logical statement. Different complexity statements can support
5.
by morpheos137 11d ago
This is true. I concede. However I am not sure that the majority of people were as imobile as you say even in mideveal times there were religious pilgrimages, fairs. Maybe the lowest stratum of non free society lived in a land locked mannor
6.
by morpheos137 11d ago
There is a shorter proof but since thinking ossified in the 20th century we won't be sociologicaly ready to accept it at this time. Much of math is playing according to arbitrary culturally enforced rules that are not natural in the se
7.
by morpheos137 11d ago
Again electric is not complex.I would say modern residential wiring is pretty fool proof. The majority of the work involves stripping wires and tightening screws. 120v is quite low vs street or transmission line voltage. Yes mis-wiring can
8.
by morpheos137 12d ago
Curious what? Residential wiring is just about the simplest building trade there is. Plumbing is actually far more complicated, you got to figure slope and elevations and make junctions that hold pressure for years or drain pipes that flow
9.
by morpheos137 12d ago
Muggles? You me unskilled overpaid llm prompters who are amazed by the world of real work?
10.
by morpheos137 12d ago
Did see the coast? Pray tell where outside of Russia did vikings live in a non martime environment? Have you seen a map of scandanavia?
11.
by morpheos137 13d ago
This site is a fantastic demonstration of what crap AI is when operated by nit wits. Notably the drawing is not in line with the actual population distribution over time. Pre 1500 years are vastly over represented. If the point is draw a ra
12.
by morpheos137 13d ago
"I drew a woman born in 715 CE in the Yangtze Basin. It claims that 96% of women were married, the average age of marriage was 18, and 44% of women died before age 15. Clearly these facts can't all be true simultaneously." Um
13.
by morpheos137 13d ago
I am almost certain this is miscoded. I drew about 20 lives and I think 17 of them were before 1500. Meanwhile the vast majority of the integral of population over time is right of 1500.
14.
by morpheos137 13d ago
Fundamentally physics is what logic permits. You can't falsify ontology from the inside. Kind of like proving a negative. These evolutionary universe theories take analogy too literally. You can not have selection outside of time. What
15.
by morpheos137 14d ago
Yeah if you are a "non playing character" why play at all?
16.
by morpheos137 14d ago
Kind of hard to have natural selection atemporally. Anyway keep dancing around the (fixed) point.
17.
by morpheos137 17d ago
I suspect it is not just when fruit is scarce many if not most primates are omnivores. Fruit is likely easier than meat most of the time but meat contains dense nutrients. Macaques e.g crab eating macaques routinely eat meat.
18.
by morpheos137 26d ago
I never studied in university and yet I acheived good exam scores. If you understand a topic and ave a reasonable memory and ability to apply my our understanding not much studying is required in my experience. If you don't understand
19.
by morpheos137 1mo ago
Another ai article, another group of self-identified smart people claiming they are not as smart as a statistical engine. "Are most ideas not original?" Sure. "Was every idea discovered first at one time or another?" Sur
20.
by morpheos137 2mo ago
Karatsuba in my understanding only becomes advantageous for very large numbers relative to human scale. Mathematically it is interesting but in engineering terms the overhead usually is not worth it for practical applications. There is a fu
21.
by morpheos137 2mo ago
Surprisingly enough the us constitution specifies a right to free speech. Meanwhile who is funding the past two decades of pie in the sky bullshit from silicon valley in the media? Is promoting and unpopular opinion illegal? Since when do w
22.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
Based on what is the level of detail to reality suprising? To me suprising means mysteriously or improbably unexpected. Why should we expect reality to be simple. Note complex and simple are somewhat subjective. The human brain evolved to j
23.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
It won't. Did automation cause people to stop working in the textile industry?
24.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
Give an example.
25.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
What is about silicon valley leaders not understanding basic economics or business management? These kind of cargo cult tactics would not fly in any other industry.
26.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
Much can be resolved when it is understood math is discovered not created. AI is a tool. if it makes discovery or proof easier that is still mathematics. A proof stands on its own logic regardless how it is derived. The root concern is how
27.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
neither. An llm is a hopelessly.inefficient real time controler.
28.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
Actually the point is total cost wise outside of subsidy it is not cheaper than humans. the bigger problem is as the parent said open AI created a market. It is selling a commodity service with investor funds. There is no moat. your second
29.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
misleading title first "easily manipulated" does not equal "spontaneously generates" we have to stop thinking of LLMs as beings and think of them as interactive libraries. There are gorey books in the library too; examp
30.
by morpheos137 3mo ago
it is text generator. just like an interactive library or smaet search engine. if we dont ban books on cryptography putting this under ITAR is rather absurd. Anthying these models train on is already public or accessible information. They j

More ›