moreaccountspls

5 ms·

1.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
There's a "Curb Your Enthusiasm" episode where Larry David's character donates to a museum with his name on the donation. There's no self deception for him; he wants to do something good AND he wants the credit. And
2.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
It lessens it for the author because they're looking for validation from someone in some type of way, the same way the breakfast people do. If you're content being someone that needs validation from other people for your actions,
3.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
It's a bit sad that you've taken a wonderful, altruistic act and cheapened it by feeling the need to broadcast it on the internet :(
4.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
No, it's not relevant. There's no considering being done, the feature is being shipped. Please stop with the Rust spam.
5.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Nah, there's something unique about Rust zealots in this respect. nicoburns comment is completely off topic, and it's extremely obnoxious to see this kind of thing over and over again from the Rust community. And I even like the
6.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
That's unfortunate. Try a different dermatologist? I've gone to flatiron dermatology in the past, and they're solid.
7.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
I wish I could upvote this a thousand times. At the end of the day, it's all ego driven development. Nobody wants to think that their job has already been solved, and what's left is mundane and boring [engineering wise]. And so th
8.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Yes, but there at least is some genuine innovation going on. The backend frameworks are just churn for solving the same boring and lucrative business problems in new, fashionable ways.
9.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Obviously you should do what you feel comfortable with, but now is a good time to go the doctor and get that checked out. The numbers are pretty low and stable for the moment. And FWIW, I had surgery last week so I'm not giving advice
10.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Alright, I'll bite. Why do you think not breaking users programs is abandoning quality?
11.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
I very well could be wrong, but that's almost completely besides the real point [as well the self diagnosis regarding ADHD]. The amount of anxiety you're experiencing in your day to day life is grossly abnormal. I would suggest no
12.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
> The lexer shouldn't have to deal with that sort of stuff. The problem with that is that the entire python ecosystem had to deal with that instead... I'm going way past rant territory at this point, but there's a reason t
13.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
So what? In the history of Python, there was literally 0 bugs caused by print being a statement. Breaking backwards compatibility for shit like that is amateur hour. edit: And just to be clear, I'm fine with making print a function for
14.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
It sounds like you're experiencing panic attacks.
15.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Writing some optional, non-essential piece != rewriting a piece that will require taking rust as a dependency for the rest of time. The kernel folks just did a lot of work to remove the strict dependency on GCC. To think any of the big play
16.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Right, which is why it's a poor choice for the kernel at this time.
17.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
For the Linux kernel? Absolutely. Rust is way too unstable right now for such an important piece of software. Give it 20 years and a standard, then we can talk.
18.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
I wouldn't be too worried about it. The kernel people aren't going to take a dependency on something that isn't standardized and doesn't have a spec.
19.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
> not putting your engineering due diligence into delivering a product to the customer. Yes. This is exactly what this person should do. Stop worrying about arbitrary rules and just deliver the damn product already. A hacky, shitty, unfi
20.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Sure. My point wasn't really whether to write unit tests or not. It's more, do what works for you / your team to enable you to ship consistently. For the OP, spending all of their time writing tests clearly isn't working
21.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
I don't understand your point. We're specifically talking about a one person company.
22.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
I'm no fan of Amazon, but it's the third most valuable company on the planet. Whatever they're doing is obviously working for them, even if I personally wouldn't want to work there.
23.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Well, then stop! Delete all the tests right now and do it however you want to do it. The thing about testing that never really gets talked about it is, what's the penalty for regressions? What's the consequences if you ship a bug
24.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
It doesn't work like that though. You can't ignore the diminishing value of money.
25.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
It's never required: https://stedolan.github.io/jq/manual/#Streaming
26.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
You think everyone building tools like k8s, terraform, etc. are fools? That's a pretty myopic worldview.
27.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
There's a difference between operating the database [SRE type job] vs consuming a database [developer]. They're both very valuable skills, but learning the basics of SQL [i.e. being a consumer] is a no brainer. The skills will ser
28.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Sure, and if the moon was made of cheese, it would still be a sphere lighting up the night sky. The fact that the go designers prioritize things like statically compiled binaries is the whole magic of Go in the first place. The language is
29.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
Or, you know, just return Object from a couple of methods. It's not the end of the world.
30.
by moreaccountspls 6y ago
You can use `go generate` with the AST package and get the same thing.

More ›