moosinho

5 ms·

1.
by moosinho 4y ago
Not exactly, if Monty randomly picked a door and happened to open a goat then it would still be beneficial for the player to swap.
2.
by moosinho 6y ago
Good point. That's probably also the case for surgeries on national holidays.
3.
by moosinho 6y ago
There is no such thing as "true probability" in Bayesian interpretation, it only exists in frequentist world. Notice that it is possible to build a robot which flips a coin in such a way that it's always heads - sure you migh
4.
by moosinho 7y ago
I wouldn't say that's the core of the paradox. The thing is that people don't have a good understanding what probability is. We think that when we choose a gate at the beginning, with a chance of winning being 1/3 it mea
5.
by moosinho 8y ago
How about an approach where the agent's reward is not the predictability itself but the first derivative of it. This way the agent will be attracted to the parts of environment where it can improve and will avoid white-noise parts sinc
6.
by moosinho 8y ago
Can someone tell me if I understand this correctly. So Bell famously proved that it is not the case that the correlation we see between 2 entangled particles A and B is because of some common cause C. Therefore we concluded that it must be
7.
by moosinho 9y ago
It is a common misconception that Chaos theory and Quantum Mechanics show that universe is random. Chaos theory is a perfectly deterministic theory that basically means fragility to initial conditions. Quantum Mechanics, at least in Copenha
8.
by moosinho 10y ago
Come on, you don't like to tinker with SharePoint Server configuration templates in your free time?
9.
by moosinho 10y ago
Hmm, why is it surprising that AI is good at poker? The way I see the game is that a bad poker player will just hold a model of his hand in mind. A slightly better one will also hold a model of his opponent's hand. Even better one will
10.
by moosinho 11y ago
If you enjoy reading about human biases coming from non-statistical point of view then check out "Thinking fast and slow" by Kahneman. Great read.