monssooon

6 ms·

1.
by monssooon 9d ago
It is sad that EU and USA are falling away from eachother. IMO we should try and stick together in these times. No doubt the US has financed a lot of things for te entire world and no doubt the European countries have put in a lot of effort
2.
by monssooon 2mo ago
It is a renewel of something highly unpopular that was voted down already. It is how the EU operates look at the other comments here about "democracy". It is put to vote on last minute where they know MEPs are on vacation... Wel
3.
by monssooon 2mo ago
What do you mean by this?
4.
by monssooon 2mo ago
I know MEPs are. But who ellected Ursula? Who as far as i understand is the mother of this survailance... Calling This orban/Putin propaganda is Low. It is removing focus from the fact that i point out democracy is slowly withering in
5.
by monssooon 2mo ago
To me as a European, this is not only about the dystopia that is becoming the tech survailance of society but it is a perfect example of what I feel the EU is. It is a disgusting dysfunctional institution that should have never been created
6.
EU: We register if you are critical about us, and shot you out(europeanconservative.com)
3 points by monssooon 3mo ago|3 comments
7.
by monssooon 3mo ago
EU is controling who gets to cover their meetings. If you have been critical in the past you are not welcome
8.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Millions and millions of euro and dollars are being "talen" in white washimg scemes for organised crime ever year. It is a crime-business in it self.
9.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I think the below comments answer rather well for me. But of course you are rigth that criminals use technology... I just don't see it as the main issue here. I think that most common currency for criminals are still just cold cash...
10.
by monssooon 3mo ago
This is what I fear the most. It is gas lighting and just manipulation. The idea of privacy will become associated with crime. Further down the line technical solutions that are private will become illegal and in general not being pro surva
11.
by monssooon 3mo ago
The point was the conflict of interest. But yes what you said could maybe even make the conflict even more pronounced
12.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I think the EU thinks that opposition to the EU must be from foreign actors. This is why citizens has to be surveiled so that the EU can catch the foreign actors or some goofy crap like that. My point being that the opposition to the EU com
13.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Yeah I agree they will put people to prison for trying to get around chat control
14.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Well put
15.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Denmark is a world leading producer of windmills
16.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I think Denmark is one of the most surveiled countries. And with the most compliant population. They call it trust... Denmark is not the fairytale they try to market them selves as. This is closer to their true color in my opinion. You coul
17.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Agree. A while ago I met many normies who just complied. Now there is so much legislation that even the normies are starting to ask what is going on. But I guess that of exactly why they now need chat control! To get the herd back to work..
18.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Chat control is about controlling peoples life's and minds. The really scary part is how many actually wants this and mindlessly buy into the narrative the EU put forth about why it is needed. Also worth noting is that this was voted
19.
by monssooon 3mo ago
They can land stuff on the moon... Generally they have world class engineers and production... Just from that point or view I don't see why not...
20.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I'm not sure if you are agreeing or disagreeing? Or are you discussing a semantic thing?
21.
by monssooon 3mo ago
The idea I was referring to is that of the great reset. I don't disagree that it is great that poor people can borrow things. But it scares me that people see it as an ideal. It is a symptom of acceptance of a poorer quality of life. I
22.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I agree. Even creating a mesh node could become an illegal act
23.
by monssooon 3mo ago
It is fine in some cases. But what is at stake here is not identifying yourself in a couple of common sense situations. It is enabling control infrastructure for governments whom are becoming increasingly undemocratic in a society where the
24.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Yes I fear this is true. It does not sound like progress ;(
25.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I like your spirit :)
26.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Haha stop already friend
27.
by monssooon 3mo ago
This is much bigger than online privacy. It is about survailance and control of society. And possibly even a completely new society. Or a splitting of society into groups... But to your point on anonymity. That has been protected in letter
28.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Isn't the entire idea that all sites and use of the internet should be tied to your real identity. Of not publicly displayed then at least verifiable by the state
29.
by monssooon 3mo ago
Unfortunately I think most normies is thinking like this. And buy into the idea that we must all give up what we have so far considered freedom ideals because the bad guys will get us if we don't. In my opinion this is just blind compl
30.
by monssooon 3mo ago
I second this. Get off the net and away from the established society and into the parallel ones

More ›