monadic2

5 ms·

1.
by monadic2 6y ago
Of course I'd be willing to pay for new train tracks. I've wasted days of my life in northern virginia waiting for the track to free up. And they wonder why nobody uses the train!
2.
by monadic2 6y ago
Speaking from personal experience working with these reputation warehouses and with handling a good deal of incoming and outgoing email volume, they aren't any more effective than other IP-based spam heuristics and if everyone configur
3.
by monadic2 6y ago
Congressmen may not realize this.
4.
by monadic2 6y ago
I just don't get what there is to show off. It's a phone. It's not like you built the thing! People are willing to address that these phones are "beautiful", whatever that means, without acknowledging that the diffe
5.
by monadic2 6y ago
It was recently found to be unconstitutional by the supreme court, no? This seems to be asserting a stronger claim that it was also illegal then , not that it has since ceased.
6.
by monadic2 6y ago
I'm actually a big fan of Netflix exactly as you articulated you don't like it—if I have an empty head, I sit down and click through to find something to watch. Not currently subscribed, though, and I wish it came at a slightly lo
7.
by monadic2 6y ago
The reason it's not good for kids is that the houses with enough space are either crazy expensive or far from work. Trust me if I could afford it I would love to live in SF.
8.
by monadic2 6y ago
Also—I just found this out a month ago—a "nutritionist" is not the same thing as a dietitian, which is licensed. I had assumed these were one and the same.
9.
by monadic2 6y ago
I mean there's a lot of problems with patenting manufacturing processes. How do you argue this is a solid model for growing fruit?
10.
by monadic2 6y ago
I've found that an effective way to bypass recruiters and advocate for employment with your personal projects is to a) aim at small companies and b) cold-email with a cover letter. YMMV.
11.
by monadic2 6y ago
Depends entirely on threat model. More code is more surface area for vulnerabilities to be found.
12.
by monadic2 6y ago
Why would you ask for permission?
13.
by monadic2 6y ago
Reminds me of the joke "a man was selling books on the corner entitled 'how to become a millionaire'. Naturally, I bought one—turns out the trick is to sell a million books for a dollar."
14.
by monadic2 6y ago
...why not both? Obviously we would still need a green new deal even with massive nuclear investment.
15.
by monadic2 6y ago
Is that zip code itself famous? Edit: this is referring to a popular 90s american television teen drama.
16.
by monadic2 6y ago
It doesn't refer to anything that I am aware, it simply has the connotation of "looping" back, much like "doing a double take".
17.
by monadic2 6y ago
That's a problem for mathml. The more required tooling, the less likely it is to be used. TeX hits this weird sweet spot between writing code and writing a document that's very productive.
18.
by monadic2 6y ago
There are plenty of alternatives. People don't use them.
19.
by monadic2 6y ago
No, they seem explicitly designed to avoid interactive use an end user.
20.
by monadic2 6y ago
True, but this seems distracting from the point that 99% of people have terrible telecommuting lighting.
21.
by monadic2 6y ago
Still tripping at how clueless you're pretending to be. Grow the fuck up and take responsibility for your view of the world.
22.
by monadic2 6y ago
Ad fraud is when you scheme to get clicks on your own site to defraud the ad network that would pay you for the space you sold them. It is not relevant here unless you're using the extension on your own site.
23.
by monadic2 6y ago
That leads to the natural conclusion that only people valued by those in power will see society's benefits. That's not a society I want to live in.
24.
by monadic2 6y ago
I'm willing to negotiate. Starting offer: fuck your payment processor entirely.
25.
by monadic2 6y ago
Am I missing something? FAANG obviously omits a bunch of relevant large tech companies and it's rather disingenuous to be confused at its omission when the acronym obviously doesn't have an M in it. Feigning stupidity to make a po
26.
by monadic2 6y ago
Thinking about crates this way is a revelation to me. Is there any tooling to make analyzing dependencies as you did easier?
27.
by monadic2 6y ago
How is this kind of juvenile behavior accepted on this forum?
28.
by monadic2 6y ago
How do you have any clue what users want? How are you confident that what you value is what others value? I suspect most people are informed what they want via commercials and would probably be open to other ways of integrating electronics
29.
by monadic2 6y ago
There's nothing precluding the legal analysis you've outlined from stemming from a poor understanding of the underlying technology. Just because the legal reasoning is internally sound doesn't mean the resulting narrative mak
30.
by monadic2 6y ago
Presumably they'll end of life the car at some point and repair will shift to third party shops. Do they have access to the internals of the car?

More ›