momzer

5 ms·

1.
by momzer 6y ago
I'm not sure if it's the same thing, but usually, holding shift while right clicking enables the context menu in Firefox.
2.
by momzer 7y ago
Slightly offtopic: is poplar really the best material for an electrical wall plate? Wouldn't it be flammable? What's the dielectric withstand going to be like for a wooden wall plate in a humid environment like a laundry room?
3.
by momzer 8y ago
> I don’t understand why other boards can’t get themselves fully on the Linux mainline They're slowly getting pulled in kicking [1] and screaming [2]. I just installed the mainline arm64 version of Archlinux onto an Orange Pi Zero P
4.
by momzer 8y ago
Something along the lines of "careful what you say over unsecured phone lines, as it may come back and hang you".
5.
by momzer 9y ago
Just a clarification, NACHA uses SFTP rather than FTPS.
6.
by momzer 10y ago
Julia has a few Unicode operators and will allow you to tabcomplete the LaTeX symbol in the REPL [1]. For example, \div followed by TAB becomes ÷. This can be implemented in popular editors [2]. [1] Not all are the common LaTeX macros. See
7.
by momzer 11y ago
> The Lagrangian is great for solving many problems. But it is definitely not more general than Newtonian mechanics Sure it is. It's true that for certain systems, you can derive one from the other so in that sense they might be &qu
8.
by momzer 11y ago
Regarding the premise: Liberal return policies used to be rare in the middle of the 20th century—something that a few smaller retailers offered as a perk. I'm curious how much this applies say pre-WWII era (before the majority of goo
9.
by momzer 11y ago
I'm saying that the author believes 99% reliability to be “Bad (TM)”. Further evidence in the second paragraph of this post: http://danluu.com/broken-builds/ I didn't say that this is a normative viewpoint in
10.
by momzer 11y ago
The unspoken implication here is that 99% reliability is considered bad. This may not be clear if coming from a different field where 99% sounds pretty good.