Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
moabuaboud
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
No-code automation can be unopinionated and extensible
(activepieces.com)
3 points
by
moabuaboud
3y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
We, at https://github.com/activepieces/activepieces , had been using Depot. Before depot we faced extreme slow builds for ARM-based images on github machines. However, using Depot helped us reduce the image build time f
3.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
AirTable is on the way, You can see the progress of the community here: https://github.com/orgs/activepieces/projects/5 Please open an issue for Xano with your exact use case, so we know what triggers /
4.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
That's an innovative idea, I like it! Was it straightforward to set up automated notifications for the other services? Did you encounter any challenges or problems along the way?
5.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Thank you for your feedback. We will improve our HTTP request in response to your query. Our preferred method for setting up local development is through the use of a VSCode dev container, which can be found at https://www.active
6.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Our framework streamlines the process by making pieces simple to define. You only need to specify the properties and the function to carry out the action. The core takes care of everything else, from authentication to the user interface. Fo
7.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
I am delighted that you noticed the piece framework design. The connectors have no dependency on the core. We are currently working on releasing each connector as a separate npm package, which can be utilized in any codebase. If this is use
8.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Are there any programmatic methods to detect integration breakages? Simply relying on unit/integration testing with mock endpoint is not effective, as it cannot capture changes made by third parties. Being notified of breakages is a so
9.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Yup,take look there https://activepieces.com/docs/contributing/repo-structure Most current documentation is about the pieces package (Building Pieces Section), the rest will follow soon.
10.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
That's a decent feature. The main reasons we know of are versioning and IDE experience. We were designed API-first. They are clean, but undocumented yet. We currently have a draft PR that generates an OpenAPI specification. I think the
11.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
The development began two months ago and we have not encountered any scaling issues yet, as the majority of users self-host. Therefore, our priority was focused on building apps. Is there anything you believe we should consider? You are cor
12.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Hey HN, I'm one of the co-founders of Activepieces and I just wanted to give a shoutout to everyone who's been showing us love on GitHub by giving us stars. To show my appreciation, I created a flow using Activepieces to thank eve
13.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Congratulations on launch
14.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Hi, I thought I was alone in facing this problem. I am working on an open source project to handle all third-party integrations pain, (OAuth2 including multi tenancy, Caching, Cors, Logging, Error Rates, Rate Limting). Basically It will be
15.
▲
I'm building Multi tenant Segment for SaaS
(link.activepieces.com)
1 points
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
|
1 comments
16.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Hey HN, Many of SaaS (user on-boarding /chatbots) today produce data such as tracking events, generating leads and the customers keep requesting these data to be sent to their warehouses / CRMs / Analytics. Instead of buildin
17.
▲
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
Interesting, I was thinking of a way to support many CRMs integrations without building all of them in-house
18.
▲
Ask HN: Sending Data to the Customers CRMs
1 points
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
|
2 comments
19.
▲
Ask HN: Cloud Run / ECS / App Engine open source alternative, Cloud costs a lot
1 points
by
moabuaboud
4y ago
|
1 comments