Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mnowicki
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
good for you, I managed to write fizzbuzz
2.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I always say "Money doesn't buy happiness, but a severe enough lack of money can certainly cause unhappiness"
3.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
What we're Nietzsche's opinions on politics/women? I'm not surprised based on the bit of his work that I read that he has some unappealing thoughts on women, but am surprised to here his politics may be problematic as we
4.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
again, I got the vaccine and I'm not anti-vax, but why are people getting downvoted for making valid points just because they aren't following the popular narrative. Did this website become reddit? You can acknowledge someone made
5.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I know most reasonable people disagree with this persons views, but why are they getting downvoted? They made a reasonable point and provided a source from the CDC. I'd much rather see a rebuttal than downvotes and no response. Definit
6.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
yeah, I'm very far from being right-wing or anti-vaccine or anything like that, but I've been unsettled by this whole thing. I don't think there are microchips in the vaccine, and it's probably a good idea to get the vac
7.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I have to assume there's a decent chance that the designer started this suit to gain some attention and attract homophobic customers, and contribute to their christian marriage web dev companies brand. Could be wrong, they could just r
8.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
You lept straight from "Sometimes these mental tools produce correct results" (which is true) to "These tools are the only way to produce correct results" (a ridiculous distortion). Those aren't mutually exclusive.
9.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I'm guessing based on his business practices and attitude in interviews/statements. I don't claim to be an expert though, that's why I qualified my post stating that's it's purely my speculation, just like the
10.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
Good point, maybe he could stop actively hurting people before thinking about helping them. I always overlook that somehow
11.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
maybe I'll write a short story about Bezos and Musk both wanting to become the savior of earth and competing to save humanity first/better to feed their own egos, to the point where they start sabotaging each others efforts to gai
12.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
This is just my own speculation, equally as invalid as the authors, but at most I'd say Bezos thinks his goals are entirely genuine, but it's entirely based on narcissism and wanting to be the only one smart/powerful enough t
13.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
yeah true. I think it'd be best for others if they stopped being liberals. (\s btw)
14.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
~18-25 IIRC is the normal age for prodromal schizophrenia to occur(the early phase where symptoms begin to manifest) so that makes sense. If you don't get it by that age it's extremely unlikely to start experiencing symptoms at an
15.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
also it's 2% "of diagnosis" connected to marijuana use. So the difference would be if marijuana use is more commonly known/reported, regardless of whether they have 100 or 10000 diagnosis
16.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I have literally seen an article before that said prodromal(pre/early onset) schizophrenia leads to Marijuana use, and I remember wondering at the time how they knew which way the causation went. I'm also not sure if it's jou
17.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
regardless of whether it's technically correct(or who even gets to decide that) - the point of using language is to communicate, if you are communicating what you want then you're accomplishing your goal. Sometimes you might want
18.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
That's kind of expected though right? "Cutting off the network of people that moderates my views and is making my views less moderate." I understand that people can be harsh nowadays, presumably because they often find the vi
19.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
They don't have to believe in their own destruction. There are several minority youtubers who are ver successful who support the far-right for their own benefit, to gain support and notoriety to support their grift. And the far-right l
20.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
If trying to come up with one of these ideas anyway, that is a good way to find one. Ask yourself, if there is one thing that I might be able to think of, that almost nobody else in the world can, what would it be? What unique combination o
21.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
Is it reasonable to say the universe might be superdeterministic, but in the example of choosing measurements for an experiment(or almost any other example imaginable), it might as well be truly random as the causal links affecting the inst
22.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I've had the same issue, and out of the many therapists I've seen only 1 was effective. Many people have trouble finding decent therapists, and I could go on for hours about bad ones - e.g one who went through the DSM, starting wi
23.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I've watched Dr. K a few times, and one on hand I'm sure he helps a lot of people and he genuinely seems to care about his viewers/'patients', so overall he's a net positive in my mind. But I do get very annoye
24.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
en croissant
25.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
> But why come to for-profit company and demand that company to stop making profits? It does not make sense to me. I agree this is foolish, but at the same time don't blame people for trying. I'm glad these companies have at le
26.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I view it as a more inconvenient, less effective(but still effective), but more obtainable(in many states) form of Suboxone. It can stave off withdrawal, cravings, etc. And it can get you high and be it's own addiction. It's still
27.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
> Basic principles of civilized society like respect of private property (which is the company which is owned by shareholders) and respect of contracts, and these principles are more important than employee wishes to play CEO. This alone
28.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I didn't know that there were no laws requiring companies to act in the interest of shareholders, I guess that's a common myth. It still seems pretty evident that the power structure at larger companies necessitates that people do
29.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
I understand your individual points, but not your final conclusion. It gives me the sense that you think maximizing profits for shareholders is "the greater good", moreso than doing what(in the opinion of employees) is right. I to
30.
▲
by
mnowicki
5y ago
Instructions unclear, now the largest e-commerce website is owned by some trees
More ›