mmaunder

5 ms·

1.
by mmaunder 8d ago
LOVE this. Game changer in capability and it'd kill Resolve if they didn't do it.
2.
by mmaunder 11d ago
A graceful pivot. Almost no tire noise.
3.
by mmaunder 11d ago
Health determines the quality and quantity of time, so put that at the top above all else.
4.
by mmaunder 15d ago
Making clear the scale of distillation they’re combating.
5.
by mmaunder 17d ago
Frustrating for EU companies trying to stay competitive globally.
6.
Wordfence Argus Finds 6 Step Critical RCE in Avada Theme with 1M Sales(wordfence.com)
2 points by mmaunder 22d ago|0 comments
7.
by mmaunder 25d ago
It actually doesn’t matter. Pick your favorite way of giving a dev access to capability on a remote server.
8.
by mmaunder 25d ago
My dream was for MCP to allow services like ours (cybersecurity) to provide a self documenting endpoint with authentication, and we just give users a URL and it just frikkin works. Instead from day 1 it’s been multiple standards as they piv
9.
by mmaunder 26d ago
At the risk of angering the zeitgeist, destroying one or two or ten paper copies doesn’t make AI companies “become the only ones in the world with digital copies.”.
10.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
lol. Apache mpm event was released a year after Nginx and was horrible and only became stable in 2012, about 8 years after Nginx was released.
11.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
Oh my. Funny story. Kerry and I (the Wordfence founders) met at eToys dot com back in the day and she’s now my wife of 20 years. Anyway at eToys she ran the web QA team and I ran the warehouse management system in Europe. At eToys we had ov
12.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
The researchers who published Attention Is All You Need didn’t have the benefit of the LLMs they birthed. Take a look at the prompt that solved the Cycle Double Cover conjecture, and which has been adapted to achieve breakthroughs in cybers
13.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
Remember when we needed 200 servers for an enterprise website because Apache used one process or thread per connection - and Nginx collapsed that into a single box overnight? That moment for LLMs is near. It’s going to move us from the big
14.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
And I was comparing salmon farms to cattle feed lots in the USA, not saying “salmon feed many”. Wow that got hilariously off track.
15.
by mmaunder 1mo ago
Because of financial incentives. And it makes critics sad when films aren’t shot where their story is based. Saved you reading it.
16.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Salmon feed lots, with a similar problem of concentrated waste, cruelty and unhealthy animals. Sounds like the underwater egg solution they discuss in the article might also be solving an optics issue they have. Out of sight, out of mind.
17.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
They’ve bred more docile salmon, according to the article. Getting that DNA into wild populations would be problematic I’d imagine.
18.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
“Each of the results cost roughly $100,000 in API cost to develop.” And “Over the course of a week, one Anthropic researcher worked together with Claude to develop the HAWK attack, and another researcher built a scaffold4 that allowed Claud
19.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Turns out sitting quietly in a room and doing math is worth more than all the money and network in the world.
20.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Wonder how long until a leaker emerges. Incentives are strong for someone to do the right thing and get credit for doing it.
21.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Had to read this one twice: “Projects "written and maintained with heavy use of LLMs".” Isn’t that almost everything these days? If you’re using vscode or codex or Claude CLI you’re in that category.
22.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
The letter really dances around the issue that we don’t want to see a ban on the release and use of open weights foreign or domestic models in the US. If we do it will leave us at a severe competitive disadvantage in a global context. Many
23.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Not seeing a long thread there. Is that the wrong link?
24.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Seems that “oracle routing” is a term the authors invented. Also sounds like they’re sending requests to all routes but assuming the readers request will route to the “best” model. The closest thing to what they’re describing is semantic ro
25.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Re local LLMs: “You avoid the uncanny valley where the model appears to be intelligent before doing something stupid; the stupidity is self-evident and this helps calibrate your interactions.” Making the authors stance on LLMs clear.
26.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Agreed re reasoning. I’ve seen this play out with 5x reasoning negating cost savings.
27.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Historically these have been quickly shut down without much of an explanation.
28.
by mmaunder 2mo ago
Or an allegedly even more dangerous model that they refuse to release. What a joke Anthropic has become.
29.
by mmaunder 3mo ago
25 gig is still expensive for consumers to configure end to end.
30.
by mmaunder 3mo ago
The new normal for the next decade: You must protect the public from us and all others, and we are your closest ally so we make your rules for us and our competition. This wasn’t a lucky outcome. They laid the groundwork years ago with the

More ›