Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mluggy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
Why Relying on Robots.txt Disallow Directive Isn't Enough
(lugassy.net)
2 points
by
mluggy
3y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
Yes, I skimmed a bit on the "registration" flow. it is a simple "mailto" link with 3 advantages: a) provides the required name and email, b) verifies you're a legitimate person and c) white-list our team email so we
3.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
If someone hasn't stayed long enough to trigger GA, is it really a user? :) Another option: only delay the scripts the first time user has landed on your page I think the single script embed is a good path (much better than asking peop
4.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
How is this different/more scalable than running google tag manager as async, with the rest of the scripts as defer/async as well. Not so long ago I side-project fassttt.com and thought the biggest issues are server-side, with bad
5.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
Hi guys, quarantine 3 project 3 (2 previous were fassttt.com and searchiiing.com). Trying to simplify how experts communicate with clients. Expert set a weekly price and an alias email to interact. I only forward emails from paying clients
6.
▲
Show HN: Payymail – Turn followers into paying clients
(payymail.com)
4 points
by
mluggy
6y ago
|
2 comments
7.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
tl;dr - amazon owes us $30k
8.
▲
by
mluggy
6y ago
albeit harder to scale, i think private lessons from the gamer have better chance
9.
▲
It's time to shut down Amazon Associates
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
mluggy
6y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
is there a reason why you can't have a deployment/set of pods per client? the article keeps mentioning every solution failed when the whole dataset hit a certain limit.
11.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
with ssl? really? I'd love to see an example
12.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
Netlify requires your entire domain moved over for custom hostname/ssl. a deal breaker for most.
13.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
somehow agree (well the 2nd camp is 4 different reasons). in any case that's valuable feedback that can be given at scale.
14.
▲
Should YC provide rejection feedback?
(twitter.com)
1 points
by
mluggy
7y ago
|
2 comments
15.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
rejection. solo, international technical founder. rant here: https://twitter.com/mluggy/status/1118481093831876608
16.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
we crash, we learn. עם ישראל חי
17.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
sorry for the rant, just realized my gke microservices requires a minimum of $18/month each to be exposed externally..
18.
▲
by
mluggy
7y ago
classic cloud announcement. a new service that sorta does something sorta different based on sorta mature sorta open source that is sorta configurable and has no pricing of yet. but sure, let's go ahead and announce it.
19.
▲
by
mluggy
8y ago
thanks. some projects have 20+ collaborators/contributors, you're suggesting i'll let the maintainers distribute funds?
20.
▲
My startup was acquired and I want to reward my NPM dependencies
5 points
by
mluggy
8y ago
|
2 comments
21.
▲
by
mluggy
8y ago
wow, great stuff. i was starting to do the same after watching dozens of yc videos. you made it better :)
22.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
guys use ansible. it care less about who's the cloud provider and uses ssh (agent-less configuration).
23.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
S3 is $0.023/GB (still x4 higher), plus $0.004 per 10K requests CloudFront is $0.085/GB, plus $0.0075-$0.01 per 10K requests) GCP is $0.08-0.12/GB (same for all services), plus $5 per 1M requests) And who says most of the ban
24.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
i assume ovh and hetzner? care to share more of your experience with them?
25.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
yes. except DO bandwidth is $0.006 instead of $0.09/GB. am I paying extra for the sole existence of other services?
26.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
"used to" - correct. my thoughts exactly 1 year ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12235003
27.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
didn't get your last remark re bandwidth. If 1TB alone costs $90 at both GCP/AWS, how is 3TB + 2 CPU instance for $20 is a poor choice?
28.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
You do get additional 2-3TB per instance which alone is a couple hundred $$ in bandwidth savings. Will it cover the price of these extra instances? Obviously if you need 8 SSDs DO isn't for you. But the real question is - could GCP be
29.
▲
by
mluggy
9y ago
I wasn't focusing on product lineup. GCP is clearly superior to DO and AWS even more. I was just offering an alternative to someone primarily using compute. It seems AWS LightSail understood this too: https://amazonlightsail
30.
▲
Goodbye Google Cloud, Hello Digital Ocean
(lugassy.net)
87 points
by
mluggy
9y ago
|
69 comments
More ›