mlspector

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mlspector 5y ago

   You've understood me perfectly. No counter-arguments from me; what follows are just some thoughts that your comment inspired. > In the same way an apple tree apples, the universe peoples. It also dogs, and weathers and softwares and
2. 2.▲
   by mlspector 5y ago

   Yes, this captures the essence of what I'm saying. I would just add for clarity that I don't think that it's "wrong" for us to elevate life that's more like us, and so I don't think it's "wrong&q
3. 3.▲
   by mlspector 5y ago

   I'm writing the arguments and questions below in good faith. I'm legitimately conflicted over this, and I admit that I haven't engaged in any research on this subject. From what I can tell, the moral argument that you're
4. 4.▲
   by mlspector 7y ago

   I work on a project called OpenReview ( https://openreview.net ) that aims to improve scientific peer review by encouraging transparency and research on the peer review process itself. Right now most of our activity is within the
5. 5.▲
   by mlspector 7y ago

   You might be interested in OpenReview, which is doing something like this, mainly in the ML/AI academic community. (Disclaimer: I’m one of the developers) https://openreview.net
6. 6.▲
   by mlspector 7y ago

   OpenReview | Full Stack Developer | Remote, Onsite (Amherst/Boston MA) | OpenReview is building software for transparent scientific peer review, advanced review-paper matching systems, and knowledge bases for scientific communities. We
7. 7.▲
   by mlspector 8y ago

   I'm one of the main developers of OpenReview.net, and I would love to discuss this more with you, but like the other commenter, I can't figure out how to get your email from your profile (I'm also generally new to HN and may
8. 8.▲
   by mlspector 9y ago

   I'm one of the main developers of OpenReview.net, and we're trying to do something similar to APPRAISE as described in the OP. Right now we mainly focus on the machine learning research community, and one conference in particular