mlazos

6 ms·

1.
by mlazos 6d ago
It’s to the point I don’t even read Anthropic’s marketing blog anymore lol. The ai psychosis is just so real when people take these fluff blog posts which never have evidence or reproducibility and treat them like gospel
2.
by mlazos 7d ago
It’s crazy to me that companies/researchers share important data with these AI labs, you’re basically giving them your secret sauce which they then share with all of your competitors via training on conversations. At the same time I do
3.
by mlazos 8d ago
I don’t think you realize how often depressed people say they will but don’t commit suicide, and also being able to know when is quite remarkable - I think this study is pretty interesting, and not as obvious as you think it is.
4.
by mlazos 20d ago
Laws should not be executed on the whim of the executive branch.
5.
by mlazos 1mo ago
Except you paid for the words of the conversation..
6.
by mlazos 1mo ago
Codex literally reads Claude.md, this isn’t even news. Companies send literally of their context to these ai models..
7.
by mlazos 2mo ago
The models are open source, it’s never been a requirement for someone to document the entire process of creating something to be “open source”. Just sharing the source, in this case, the weights, meets the criteria. Software engineering’s o
8.
by mlazos 2mo ago
Google and Amazon are Anthropic investors right?
9.
by mlazos 2mo ago
Yeah I fully expect companies with lots of GPUs but not a good model like Microsoft and Amazon to just take these open weight models and make money, the GPU expense is the only moat at this point. It’s classic commoditize your complement, n
10.
by mlazos 2mo ago
How can you be hitting cache on what I think are novel LLM prompts …
11.
by mlazos 2mo ago
Yeah but we still don’t have execution vans! I’m not even being sarcastic. China is unequivocally worse even with our recent slide into towards totalitarianism.
12.
by mlazos 3mo ago
In the 2010s all of my exams were still hand written and I went to Brown.. has everything really been computerized that much? I think the tricky part here is essays, but maybe they should be replaced with an oral exam + essays? A lot of the
13.
by mlazos 3mo ago
Wtf? What a joke, but I mean the best way to become a billionaire is convince someone with a billion dollars to give it to you. This is actually insane, wow. I guess Qualcomm is desperate? Nobody was bidding for this, but congrats to the te
14.
by mlazos 3mo ago
I work on PyTorch torch.compile and it’s a tracing compiler as well. Perhaps this domain is very narrow though; it is also a very not conventional compiler, you’d probably be deeply offended by some of the stuff we do! ;)
15.
by mlazos 3mo ago
The idea of them purposefully wasting my time by having the model act dumber and me having to argue with it without knowing if it’s the prompt or the model was just such an idiotic product decision I can’t believe they shipped that without
16.
by mlazos 4mo ago
Ah, the ever present “nothing to see here” take. What this government is doing is worse than it’s ever been. At least before when you had your grant it wouldn’t be randomly cancelled at any time.
17.
by mlazos 4mo ago
I believe them to some degree but this trend of posting stuff when it can’t be verified actually needs to end. I’m so tired of this bs marketing.
18.
by mlazos 4mo ago
Oh weird, everything must be fine then, I still see snow sometimes even!
19.
by mlazos 5mo ago
I think one day later the guy got his refund? You all need to chill I feel like. HN is a bubble sometimes https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/53262#issue...
20.
by mlazos 5mo ago
By the letter of the law the guy fixing his car should be prosecuted, but like nobody is going to know and it’s not going to happen. In this case it’s pretty obvious the law was broken.
21.
by mlazos 5mo ago
Look! A guy built 95% of slack in 2 weeks! Very skeptical of that btw, but also an organization that justifies every single team by exactly how much $ value they’re generating sounds like hell. How would you ever innovate or try out new ide
22.
by mlazos 6mo ago
Idk I think they kind of do, tackling climate change is a good idea and at this point I’m ready to lie if it will make ppl do something
23.
by mlazos 6mo ago
Honestly people spoke like this before, just on LinkedIn. Now that ai trained on it we have LinkedIn.. everywhere. Welcome to hell.
24.
by mlazos 6mo ago
I read the tests, it also is really really good to have Claude verify that removing the changes in question break the tests. This brings the quality way way up for me.
25.
by mlazos 6mo ago
Randomness does not imply the uniform distribution
26.
by mlazos 6mo ago
Bro nothing is verifiable, you have to make a call in the end or you can just sit here and be like “oh but what about the speck of sand on the body, GOTCHA”. I used to be like you trying to poke holes in every little thing, but 1 it’s annoy
27.
by mlazos 6mo ago
Seen this on repeat lately - there will be some war crime that the IDF commits, soldiers or Israeli citizens celebrate it themselves in a TikTok or in Israeli media, then the US media will argue that it didn’t happen or “there’s some inform
28.
by mlazos 7mo ago
Maybe I’m getting old but I couldn’t tell if this was a joke or not. I think they should explain a little more like what these products actually do?
29.
by mlazos 7mo ago
That’s 100% insider trading. If you use material non-public (including confidential) information to perform the trade it’s illegal. Paying someone to provide confidential info is still insider trading. Paying someone to observe planes (publ
30.
by mlazos 9mo ago
This is the absolute biggest grift of the century by the groq team. They never shared actual TCO, and I remember a Seminalaysis article about the power consumption being actually insane - this makes sense because they scale the number of ch

More ›