mk89

11 ms·

1.
by mk89 19d ago
Becoming and staying a leader in innovation sometimes requires shortcuts. You can also frame a law to make that exception specific for an industry, a field or a group so it doesn't become the norm (or time box it, if you want). You nee
2.
by mk89 19d ago
In some MAJOR banks (not gonna say which one), the last digits of the IBAN are also used as username. So basically people outside can lock your online account. I am shocked by how F** dumb this was ever designed.
3.
by mk89 20d ago
It's the Malaria tropica according to [0]: > Im Zusammenhang mit den bereits bekannten sechs Fällen von Malaria tropica bei Personen, die am Flughafen Frankfurt am Main tätig sind, sind zwei Erkrankte verstorben And a quick search s
4.
by mk89 20d ago
I think stackoverflow jobs was better than all the alternatives we ever had or have now (which are ridiculous). If there is one thing I miss on the internet is indeed stackoverlow jobs. Crazy that it didn't work out. LinkedIn is the Fa
5.
by mk89 22d ago
Make him do side projects, something he can explain and be proud of. Online communities, some github projects he might be interested, ...anything. Let him contribute to something, yes for free, so that potential future coworkers can see 1)
6.
by mk89 22d ago
I agree because there was always this "well, you don't have experience...". Wtf of course i don't, otherwise i would not apply for a junior role!
7.
by mk89 23d ago
EU is huge and hourly rates are different in many countries. Nevertheless, the point is not the electronic toothbrush, but rather the "BIG" stuff that costs much and it's creating a lot of garbage. A 1200 euro TV that breaks
8.
by mk89 23d ago
I just used it on 4 texts. The 1st version was the output from my first (chatGPT) prompt. The 4th was the last prompts of "reduce, make it less AI, etc" of the same original request/output. In all cases it was meatbag. In the
9.
by mk89 24d ago
The rule applies to imported goods too. So not sure why would overseas electronics get a free pass.
10.
by mk89 29d ago
I don't understand why we keep on building right next to highways which are some of the worst things for our health. You don't need to live in the countryside for that. Just stay roughly 1km away from them and the situation is sig
11.
by mk89 2mo ago
> so there will be a displacement of medium to large companies by much smaller ones. There are so many regulations EE companies follow and offer that no startup owner or worker could ever deal with. The moment your company shifts to that
12.
by mk89 2mo ago
The Green Deal solves nothing. We pollute right outside our block, give credits to companies claiming to be "green" so that we can sell hardware here that is certified, so that we can go to sleep a bit happier as human beings, bec
13.
by mk89 2mo ago
Sure, SPD didn't have anything to do with it. Schröder and the Greens didn't have anything to do with it at all. The Green party itself was literally born out of a protest against nuclear reactors in the 70's (Whyl). CDU trie
14.
by mk89 2mo ago
All you need to do to understand what task is more complex (for a robot to solve) is just to ask a 6-8 years old child to do it. It takes days before they "understand". So it cannot be that simple (for the reasons you mentioned)
15.
by mk89 2mo ago
The uncut footage is so awesome. Of course, you can mention all the things they can't do (what if there are stairs, what if the doors are smaller than the robot, etc) but it's mindblowing to see what they can do - and also the cha
16.
by mk89 2mo ago
EU didn't close nuclear plants, not sure what you're talking about. This is a choice some countries did in the past due to Chernobyl and Fukushima. The "fatality" was performed successfully by the Greens.
17.
by mk89 2mo ago
OP said "Germany decided". EU did the Green Deal, though, which is way worse than shutting down a few nuclear reactors that after all didn't produce that much energy anymore and were anyways planned to be shut down.
18.
by mk89 2mo ago
OP used the word "lifetime" which makes a key difference. I don't want to be responsible for a bug in my 8 years old code, which I probably even forgot how it worked etc. I probably don't even work anymore in the same te
19.
by mk89 3mo ago
At my company someone has introduced an internal tool that should help understand and give a "score" to design documents from teams. Needless to say, this tool gives scores exactly like the article mentions. Same document, same LL
20.
by mk89 3mo ago
If the code is unreachable is obviously not a threat, Mythos or not. Can you do this analysis for all your 200+ services, libs etc? This is the main issue about compliance nowadays. In a fedramp scenario you would very likely have to prove
21.
by mk89 3mo ago
I am not against AI but putting automation tools is in a different category than "AGI, you only need specs and they do the work for you". 20 years ago even with automation etc you needed armies of people to make something work. It
22.
by mk89 3mo ago
Not as a metric, but it basically becomes one, like with Fedramp. You need to fix also moderate/low CVEs within a certain time frame. So CVE count becomes relevant, because the target is zero, although it doesn't mandate "zer
23.
by mk89 3mo ago
Not sure about the downvote. I'd like to know how a "critical CVE running in your software for 29 days" is acceptable from a security standpoint. With nowadays tooling, these AI agents can take you down in no time if they tar
24.
by mk89 3mo ago
This is true, but security teams often work on tooling dedicated to reduce the n. of CVEs so that a company can keep compliance. That is in fact part of compliance itself to have an automated/reliable processo to tackle CVEs...
25.
by mk89 3mo ago
Well you're a bit different then... In my experience it is becoming basically ridiculous that we disallow compliance based on a number of cve, their level, etc. It's just a checkbox, but it has nothing to do with security.
26.
by mk89 3mo ago
Oh no, you're in for a surprise. "Especially now" all these infosec folks "need to get CVEs fixed because compliance/SOC2, etc" and they will be even more up your a*! Something has to change with how compliance
27.
by mk89 3mo ago
Was it a better prompt? Have you tried giving the same prompt to other models? I have found out that the mistakes of other models (which I choose first to save money) help me refine the prompt more and more, until I am fed up and pick Opus
28.
by mk89 3mo ago
Can you give an example of what those "toughest problems/great code" are? I don't need to know the prompt nor the output, but the general idea, what it is about.
29.
by mk89 3mo ago
I used to think of a bubble too. However, I think actually that while it won't give the results expected (AI agents run the company, build all features, etc.), it will nevertheless become a developer tool like IDEs, something "you
30.
by mk89 4mo ago
>I've never worked at any company where there was any limit to the work to be done. Sales people don't give a shit what your product can do, only what they can sell, and they never sleep. The issue is how much of that work is &

More ›