misuba

10 ms·

1.
by misuba 10y ago
Where are the people who are asking for help with this? Will people who value having fewer distractions on their screens be opted into this great content? And what about spam?
2.
by misuba 10y ago
At least they have the decency to tell you who they work for right in their name.
3.
by misuba 11y ago
...or played with systems that got them more of what they want, instead of insisting they want a RNG despite always being unhappy with what it gives them.
4.
by misuba 11y ago
What's the emoticon for mortal terror, though?
5.
by misuba 11y ago
True of rent, for sure. The rest is fairly stable.
6.
by misuba 11y ago
So split it up. Most React projects make use of Webpack or Browserify, or use ES6 modules via Babel. There are emerging patterns for keeping concerns in separate places but still having one component you can drop in declaratively.
7.
by misuba 11y ago
If there were profit in solving real problems, there wouldn't be any real problems.
8.
by misuba 11y ago
> News was their product, but they made their money by delivering ads to everyone's doorstep on a daily basis. How does Google make money?
9.
by misuba 11y ago
As discussed elsewhere in the thread, rights are not at issue; social consequences are. This is about a group of people saying, "not everything you have the right to do is beneficial. When introducing something into a given conversatio
10.
by misuba 11y ago
A common disease in any "crowd," yes.
11.
by misuba 11y ago
They've never liked it. Now they're being listened to. (I look forward to finding out over the next decade how many plain facts I can quote that I will then hear repeated back to me as a label for "that crowd.")
12.
by misuba 11y ago
These things have always been socially negotiated, though. We have a new social playing field and we aren't fully sure how it works; that is a much more useful focus for this issue than free speech is.
13.
by misuba 11y ago
Where you read "safety" in this article and other discussions of the issue, it's illuminating to substitute the words "regard as full human beings." Contexts that don't regard certain classes of people - those
14.
by misuba 11y ago
Hey man, I just finished "What is Code," gimme a minute to refill my magazine-article bar. As for my admittedly prejudicial feelings towards The Economist, it's been a long ride and I couldn't point to anything specific.
15.
by misuba 11y ago
> However, it is pretty clear the intent of the academic in question was to promote discussion and debate about racism. The Internet - yes, that other one with all the SJWs and their vapid twitterings - has a saying it is wise to take to
16.
by misuba 11y ago
Not discussed in the article's introduction is whether Mr. Tanyolacar, and by extension The Economist, might possibly have any learning to do about how race works in America, and whether that learning might be something that he and the
17.
by misuba 11y ago
I think I'm like most of us in that I had completely forgotten about annotations. They sound cool. But I suspect that many of us also don't much want Twitter to get better anymore. We'd rather see an alternative get good en
18.
by misuba 11y ago
"HТML uses a Cyrillic ‘Т’ to avoid any possible confusion with HTML." brb laughing until I cry
19.
by misuba 11y ago
> it's irresponsible to point out a pile of shit without pointing to a shovel. Nope, try another metaphor: you have the right to flinch away when something stinks, even if you don't know where the nearest rose garden is. (That
20.
by misuba 11y ago
Ember Data was incomplete for a long time after Ember was new. It may have been usable, but it came with a lot of scary don't-use-this language.
21.
by misuba 11y ago
You will probably need to support him - all of these things are soon going to be out of the reach of people who can reach them now.
22.
by misuba 11y ago
What are some of the popular applications for SDR? I can't imagine it's all pirate radio and such.
23.
by misuba 12y ago
What is the specific thing you feel you're being forced to do?
24.
by misuba 12y ago
What I hear you saying is you personally identify with what you perceive as intellectual honesty, what you perceive as rationality, and the freedom to say whatever you want without worrying whether listeners will like it. The trouble with s
25.
by misuba 12y ago
The point is, how do you know the difference between something that's "who you really are" and something that you simply feel discomfort around being asked to change?
26.
by misuba 12y ago
Please, please, please do not help every nerd who experiences discomfort at being called out on sexism to believe they have some undiagnosed shadow syndrome and are being oppressed because of it. Please don't do that. If only because i
27.
by misuba 12y ago
And, I should be clear, for me as well. I happen not to have bad reactions to expressions of feminism - if I knew how I avoided that, believe me, I'd tell the world - but I carry those wounds from my childhood and they fuck up my life
28.
by misuba 12y ago
If, by your own admission, you just don't like something, you can't claim that "who [you] really are" is being "destroyed" if you're taught how to avoid injury in dealing with it. Your pet peeves are not
29.
by misuba 12y ago
But the proof can't be made. If you’re conditioned to feel like an outsider, you’re going to believe the rejection is always lurking around the corner, and the acceptance is never real, never complete. You’ll remain in sullen sureness
30.
by misuba 12y ago
It's come to a place where you don't date at work. You know, the place it's been .

More ›