misterfusion

27 ms·

1.
by misterfusion 12y ago
Nuclear fusion is a good investment for the world. Truthfully, fusion power is the final answer to our future energy needs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8n7j5k-_G8
2.
by misterfusion 12y ago
In fact, fusion energy is a definitive solution to our future energy needs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8n7j5k-_G8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUrt186pWoA
3.
by misterfusion 12y ago
A real-life warp drive can be practically possible by employing phased standing waves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zh9abFF3ZE
4.
by misterfusion 14y ago
Almost all fusion approaches have some similarities between them. For example, Polywell looks like the "Magnetic Well for Plasma Confinement". http://www.google.com/patents/US4007392?printsec=drawing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell
5.
by misterfusion 14y ago
There are a lot of key differences. Bussard IEC can be characterized by recirculation of electrons, virtual cathode, "wiffleball" magnetic compression. VASIMR can be characterized by helicon antenna, single phase instead of multiphase.
6.
by misterfusion 14y ago
Nuclear propulsion will open vast horizons to the future of mankind. I think the best option will be fusion-powered plasma turbines. http://youtu.be/ro5-QYqqxzM
7.
by misterfusion 14y ago
The Sun is not doughnut-shaped. The ITER fusion machine is conceptually flawed; the drawbacks are numerous: confinement time, plasma temperature, energy consumption, tritium breed, and there on. It is a lame that mainstream scientists think