mingqiz

6 ms·

1.
by mingqiz 6d ago
Yet i find claude code worse than opencode.
2.
by mingqiz 15d ago
By injecting that weird prompt and not by proper post training? anthropic is truly a joke.
3.
by mingqiz 2mo ago
Makes sense. Let the rest of the world use open weight models and let us government review both closed models and open models, and only allow us citizen and American companies use the censored models by paying selected trusted providers who
4.
by mingqiz 2mo ago
Not true. Enterprise pay for api. If i am allowed to use fable withouta budget, i can spend 3k per day. Using combination of cheaper models (and better at least in my experience) can lower this to 300. Considering the layoffs, thw companies
5.
by mingqiz 2mo ago
This. Claude is very good at instruction and treat my mistake in prompt as law. Gpt is just smarter at understanding my intent.
6.
by mingqiz 2mo ago
It's the other way actually. Cc is a better harness but gpt models are just so much better in my personal experience (at least for backend) ever since 5.4.
7.
by mingqiz 3mo ago
I honestly trust code reviewed by llms multiple rounds more than human reviewed code. Here is the thing. I don't know the human who wrote the code but i am familiar with the model they use, which might already be better than many human
8.
by mingqiz 3mo ago
But Claude especially copy opensource ideas after they are widely used for months
9.
by mingqiz 3mo ago
Isn't that what they are doing already? The model is already guarded and hidden and i only get to send it what i want. Talk with it to clarify my requirements. And i can switch to a different provider for cheaper/better results.
10.
by mingqiz 4mo ago
Deepseek dropped their price permanently.Now v4 pro costs 3.48% of the output token price of opus 4.7. (now that opus 4.7 has a more costly tokenizer). Is it fair to say that Anthropic/OpenAI is marching to bankruptcy as opensource mod