miller24

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by miller24 1y ago

   What's really interesting is that if you look at "Tell a story in 50 words about a toaster that becomes sentient" (10/14), the text-davinci-001 is much, much better than both GPT-4 and GPT-5.
2. 2.▲
   by miller24 1y ago

   Ah okay, well it will still lose some of the time, which is surprising. And it will lose in surprising way, e.g., thinking for 14 seconds and then making an extremely basic mistake like not seeing it already have two on a row and could just
3. 3.▲
   by miller24 1y ago

   That's exactly why it's so crazy that GPT-5 with Thinking still loses...
4. 4.▲
   by miller24 1y ago

   Well whatever your story is, I know with near certainty that no amount of scaffolding is going to get you from an LLM that can't figure out tic-tac-toe (but will confidently make bad moves) to something that can replace a human in an e
5. 5.▲
   by miller24 1y ago

   It 100% is still intelligence. GPT-5 with Thinking still can't win at tic-tac-toe.