mike741

7 ms·

1.
by mike741 24d ago
"I see the problem now - wait, let me ask some clarifying questions."
2.
by mike741 24d ago
He was quoting the claim you made. Shouldn't you have your own justification for it? Which tests did you run with both Fable as well as the best human programmers?
3.
by mike741 2mo ago
all of those predictions seem to have come true
4.
by mike741 4mo ago
i love this idea but i wish there was a simple way to play the sounds of whatever is currently selected. perhaps a play button near the top of the page or a spacebar hotkey
5.
by mike741 6mo ago
You're absolutely right! There was a crime. I appreciate the course correction—it’s a significant oversight on my part. I've updated our previous plan to better reflect that a crime occurred. You're under arrest.
6.
by mike741 6mo ago
You need a minimum threshold of karma in order to downvote others on HN. Additionally, accounts with more well received activity are harder to identify as shills. That's why there are black markets where social media accounts are bough
7.
by mike741 6mo ago
which can then translate to real-world money points
8.
by mike741 8mo ago
TLDR: "Just do it." ~ Nike
9.
by mike741 8mo ago
You didn't state any complex tasks though. You only stated programmers who use LLMs.
10.
by mike741 2y ago
Urgent updates can be necessary every once in a while but should be recognized as technical failures on the part of the developers. Failure can be forgiven, but only so many times. The comments saying "what about X update that had this
11.
by mike741 3y ago
The study references "clinicians" rather than "doctors." Clinicians include psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, physicians, paramedics, etc.
12.
by mike741 3y ago
66% accuracy is not "great" and definitely not the best there's ever been.
13.
by mike741 3y ago
for perspective, here's what 500k gallons (~0.04% of the eruption) of water vapor looks like: https://youtu.be/BIpeNs5OWbo?t=103
14.
by mike741 3y ago
oh wow. that seems like the sort of critical feature reddit should have built in.
15.
by mike741 3y ago
thanks. is the nomination and voting a built in reddit feature? if so, this sounds like a good time to use it.
16.
by mike741 3y ago
Aren't you on an alternative right now?
17.
by mike741 3y ago
how were those moderators chosen the first time around? what's to prevent them from repeating that selection process? it might take a bit of work but the circumstances seem to merit at least that much.
18.
by mike741 3y ago
but its people aren't allowed in? doesn't this prove reddit is not its people but rather a small group of moderators?
19.
by mike741 3y ago
can someone explain why Reddit staff doesn't just forcibly reopen these subs and perma-ban their moderators?
20.
by mike741 3y ago
> No one wants to look in the mirror and admit that Then that includes the employees and executives at Amazon and is all the more reason to not allow them to punish others for behavior that is (according to you) universal.
21.
by mike741 3y ago
> in an ML testing context OP was not speaking in the ML testing context, hence the misunderstanding.
22.
by mike741 3y ago
Right, so it can no longer be used to warn other viewers about scams and clickbait.
23.
by mike741 3y ago
The test is novel to the program, just not its programmer. So are we testing the program or are we actually testing its programmer? If we're testing the program, then the programmer's foreknowledge is irrelevant.
24.
by mike741 3y ago
Many =/= Most. The dislike ratio was extremely reliable when it came to identifying clickbait. Maybe you don't care about that but many others do.
25.
by mike741 3y ago
If it is incorporated, its definitely not effective. Clickbait dominates Youtube's recommendations and search despite consistently low thumb ratings. An easy example would be a procedurally generated channel such as this one: https:&#
26.
by mike741 3y ago
if its "not that much" and creates deception then why make site-wide changes that make it even less transparent? If a video had 4k dislikes and 46k likes then you knew that 4k accounts disliked it. There's little room for s
27.
by mike741 3y ago
> There would be no need for review bomb if they were widely disliked. This is circular reasoning. You're calling something a "review bomb" because you're assuming from the outset that its not widely disliked, despite
28.
by mike741 3y ago
The value of the dislike button was in warning other viewers about scams and clickbait. If you watch a bad video, realize its clickbait, and then simply move on that would be rewarding the clickbaiter and making the problem worse.
29.
by mike741 3y ago
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/return-youtube-dis... https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/return-youtub... 4,000,000+ users on chrome with 14k reviews. Maybe yo
30.
by mike741 3y ago
> LLMs can pass novel theory of mind tests, which is what we're talking about. Passing a ToM test is not what OP meant by having an "underlying theory of mind." OP's talking about the machine having an underlying mind

More ›