mihaelm

12 ms·

1.
by mihaelm 11d ago
Good points, the second is very "dual-licensing" in nature. BUSL is certainly the more "mature" option and there's a higher likelihood people came across it in the wild.
2.
by mihaelm 11d ago
You might also be interested in the O'Saasy license ( https://osaasy.dev/ ) which is in the similar vein, but simpler. HashiCorp switched to BUSL license for their products/tools when they already had substantial ma
3.
by mihaelm 11d ago
I think it definitely hurts adoption. No hobbyist or experimenter wants to delve into legalities head first by first having to understand the licensing terms of software, whereas permissive licenses like MIT and Apache 2.0 are easily-unders
4.
by mihaelm 14d ago
The verbosity takes a bit to get used too, but it sure beats the anything-goes feeling - messy as you put it - of pandas.
5.
by mihaelm 14d ago
Maybe because it's like a swiss army knife for data work, regardless of whether you need it for OLTP or OLAP workloads. Having different SQL dialects is a bit annoying, but the base is the same more or less, so switching doesn't c
6.
by mihaelm 16d ago
Lets see what they do with Opus first. I didn't find Fable 5.0 prose that bad to read, but improvement is always welcome. It's Opus 5.0 that's atrocious.
7.
by mihaelm 16d ago
I like the software side on my Series X, so if they can bring that over to PC as an OS, that'd be great. I agree the Xbox on PC experience hasn't been stellar so far and I hope they ditch that app with the next generation, for the
8.
by mihaelm 16d ago
I'm pulling for Microsoft to create an XboxOS for PC you can just freely install on any machine, as that's about the only thing I care about regarding Windows. Then I could see myself dualbooting that when I want to play my Xbox c
9.
by mihaelm 18d ago
You can also just turn off attribution in Claude Code settings if it bothers you: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/settings-reference#attributi... "To hide all attribution, set commit and pr to empty strings a
10.
by mihaelm 18d ago
Yeah, the cost of running the test suite every time an agent generates code JIT would be the killer for running it at scale. I didn't even get into practicality of that approach too much because the gist of it for me was the question o
11.
by mihaelm 18d ago
Again, I answered that in the earlier reply: > Since the comment is talking about using more & more JIT for security reasons, I assumed it extended to verification too. I wouldn't consider feeding the JIT-ed code to a JIT-ed ver
12.
by mihaelm 18d ago
Where did I say you can't do that? I answered you why I assumed the original comment was leaning towards JIT for everything.
13.
by mihaelm 18d ago
Proper verification would be deterministic rules the JIT-ed code would be checked against, so it would have to be non-JIT. Since the comment is talking about using more & more JIT for security reasons, I assumed it extended to verificat
14.
by mihaelm 18d ago
What's there to gain security-wise? Nondeterministic generation & then execution of that code without proper verification seems to be the opposite of a good security posture.
15.
by mihaelm 22d ago
We did that with Comic Sans MS
16.
by mihaelm 26d ago
The landing strip was not load-bearing enough for the translation to land clean. Another attempt is warranted — if you please.
17.
by mihaelm 26d ago
We've known Anthropic has filed for an IPO since early June.
18.
by mihaelm 29d ago
Yes, you should've clarified all the things you don't want :D
19.
by mihaelm 29d ago
I actually tried to switch Claude's `output-style` to ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English for the prose it writes (code comments, commit messages), but it didn't seem to help. Figured I'll just use GPT 5.6 Sol for impleme
20.
by mihaelm 29d ago
Cause that, along with some other Claudisms, just gives off a vibe of a highschooler trying to hit the word count on an essay.
21.
by mihaelm 29d ago
To combat it, I decided to only use Opus 5 if I'm actually talking to Fable 5 that's orchestrating it. :D Opus 5 experience is really abysmal, hopefully they can get it back on track.
22.
by mihaelm 29d ago
The actual blog post on open-sourcing: https://www.modular.com/blog/mojo-open-source I remember being really interested a few years ago when it was billed as a superset of Python. I know they pivoted away from that, bu
23.
by mihaelm 29d ago
I think the compiler not being open-source hurt with getting people to check it out. Today, people are accustomed to most of it regarding PL development being out in the open, and Mojo was an outlier here.
24.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
I guess it helps with emphasizing their Swedish identity, which is one of their goals with naming. Doesn't gel too well with "feels good to say" for a non-native speaker, but I see their point.
25.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
The bare R experience is not that great, to put it mildly, but it's a whole other story if you add tidyverse on top of it. The data work becomes really easy then, but I still prefer Python because of familiarity and a better experience
26.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
> have some kind of weird pattern baked into their text to act as a watermark. public abstract class BaseAnimalBeanFactoryGeneratedFromClaudeFactory
27.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
lol, you're right, the brainfart completely changes the meaning. I corrected it.
28.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
I'm sooo happy I pulled the trigger on upgrading and getting a new laptop (with 64 GB RAM) last summer. Feels like it was just in time before the exponential price jumps.
29.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
You just need to work out the threat model for what you're working on. For trusted containerized workloads, where the attack surface is minimal, just containerization is fine. However, agents can do just about anything on your computer
30.
by mihaelm 1mo ago
Docker Sandboxes is using microVMs, not containerization.

More ›