Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
michaelolenick
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
1.
▲
by
michaelolenick
1mo ago
It's inevitable there will be false positives, inevitable they'll do reputational or economic damage, and inevitable plaintiff attorneys will sue on the behalf of people damaged. Making it worse, it's product liability blende
2.
▲
by
michaelolenick
5y ago
Like the other reply, this is flat-out gaslighting. First, it's a fallacy that executive rates for nonprofits should be set by the market based on others. Who would say their nonprofit CEO is in the bottom half? Nobody, or they wouldn&
3.
▲
by
michaelolenick
11y ago
I was in the middle of this way back when. Software I created (well, I prototyped and hired somebody else to create), won the very first Macromedia Rich Internet Application. It created name badges from a Flash app. For those who don't
4.
▲
by
michaelolenick
13y ago
They've been doing exactly that for about 237 years.
5.
▲
by
michaelolenick
13y ago
I wish MBA's would knock it off with their everything is easy meme. Yes - software, including apps, can be created in two months. In fact we can write them in two hours, or take two years; it depends. Buried in your post is that you
6.
▲
by
michaelolenick
13y ago
Yes - this is what I meant, though I think it's also what I wrote. It's not prior art; it's obviousness, and the USPTO defines non-obvious as published, co-mingling the two. So we see lots of patents for obvious tweaks from
7.
▲
by
michaelolenick
13y ago
If these weren't depressing they'd be funny. For those who don't know the patent & trademark office (PTO) defines "obvious" as described in a prior patent or, sometimes, an academic paper. Even if everybody in