michaelmure

5 ms·

1.
by michaelmure 18d ago
In the same vein, but showing live the go allocator and GC operating on the heap of a running program: https://github.com/MichaelMure/gogc98
2.
by michaelmure 1mo ago
FWIW, I have a new and much better webui that I need to release. I'm also planning to work on PRs and other stuff around the end of the year.
3.
Show HN: Gogc98 – live visualisation of the go allocator and GC(github.com)
1 points by michaelmure 1mo ago|0 comments
4.
by michaelmure 1mo ago
I wish there was a LLM tool to explore a topic recursively, as a tree or a mindmap. You would start with some high level concept (say "cryptography") then dig further and further to more specific topics. I think that would be a wa
5.
by michaelmure 1mo ago
That's an interesting take! Not quite easy to do with a CLI tool with dozens of commands though. Maybe it would be some kind of always on server the LLM can operate on ... but then that starts to really look like graphql.
6.
by michaelmure 1mo ago
I'm asking this because as I wrote a new CLI tool I picked json as the recommended output format for LLMs. I noticed though that they easily get lost and generally consume a lot of tokens to analyse the output. I'm sure it would w
7.
Ask HN: What is a good format for a tool to report data to a LLM?
5 points by michaelmure 1mo ago|6 comments
8.
by michaelmure 4mo ago
One nice upside of having a single way to encode a value is fuzzing: when you work on an encoder/decoder, you can use a fuzzer and do round-trip comparison until you find crashes or inputs/outputs that don't match (and theref
9.
by michaelmure 5mo ago
https://github.com/git-bug/git-bug if that's your thing.
10.
Show HN: Git-ownership – A tool to visualize code ownership over time from Git(github.com)
4 points by michaelmure 6mo ago|0 comments
11.
by michaelmure 7mo ago
Any recommandation for a quality non-toy rust codebase to study?
12.
by michaelmure 7mo ago
> On CRDTs: I assume tools like git-bug adopted CRDTs primarily to avoid merge conflicts, but "last-writer-wins" via timestamps is risky FYI, git-bug doesn't use timestamps to figure out the ordering. It first uses the git
13.
by michaelmure 8mo ago
Assuming that by "table" you mean another "document type" ... pretty easily. There is a reusable CRDT like datastructure that you can use to define your own thing. You do that by defining the operations that can happen o
14.
by michaelmure 8mo ago
> Stuff like git-bug exists, but then you still need participation from other people. The plan is to 1) finish the webUI and 2) accept external auth (e.g. github OAuth). Once done, anyone can trivially host publicly their own forge and a
15.
by michaelmure 1y ago
Location: France Remote: Yes (have been 100% remote for 6+ years) Willing to relocate: No Technologies: Go, networking, protocols, identity, cryptography, local-first, CRDTs, devops, AWS, kubernetes, IaC, free software, linux Résumé/CV
16.
Peter Van Hardenburg – Local First: the secret master plan(youtube.com)
2 points by michaelmure 1y ago|1 comments
17.
by michaelmure 1y ago
With some motivation you could port git-bug to another VCS without too much problem. You would need to implement those interfaces [1]. The one you care about especially is RepoData, which mainly imply you can store a DAG, have references an
18.
by michaelmure 1y ago
Right now, yes, but the idea is to augment the webUI with external auth (e.g. Github OAuth and others) to make it a public portal where anyone can create issues and so on. In that case, the webUI would have access to the git repo, enforce a
19.
by michaelmure 1y ago
So for example, git-bug already has a PR to add support for a project board: https://github.com/git-bug/git-bug/pull/843 The same way, one could add support for code review (aka PRs), todo list, custom entiti
20.
by michaelmure 1y ago
In theory it could happen but it's unlikely in practice, for multiple reasons: - git-bug use a form of logical clock (not wall clock) that order an action in relation to other actions in the repo. Clock drifting doesn't matter. -
21.
by michaelmure 1y ago
Yes, this really meant to be some sort of framework for storing entities in git, handle the conflicts, and let you buld easily your own tool (or add more features to git-bug). See also https://github.com/git-bug/git-bug
22.
by michaelmure 2y ago
Golang does that natively ;-)
23.
by michaelmure 2y ago
The interesting thing to me is the stark difference between this and golang's approach. With golang, you can run fuzzing as simply as you run tests, which means that it's trivial to target specific parts of your application or lib
24.
by michaelmure 2y ago
Not a file storage but https://github.com/git-bug/git-bug push and sync with any git remote. There is a generic data structure you can use to build your conflict-free type.
25.
by michaelmure 3y ago
A practical example of a op-based Merkle-DAG CRDT is (I believe) git-bug[1]. Some doc here[2]. I originally wrote something akin to an op-based CRDT and enforcing a purely linear series of commits in git's DAG, but eventually found tha
26.
by michaelmure 3y ago
I always wondered: is there actual study about this? There is people arguing both ways with relatively good arguments, but what about quantifiable realities? As the author of GPL-licensed softwares, I didn't have much reasons to go tha
27.
by michaelmure 3y ago
As a sort of spiritual successor to git-appraise, I've been working on git-bug[1] which support issues and will at some point support kanban and code review. There is a few notables improvements: - CRDT-like reusable data structure [2]
28.
by michaelmure 3y ago
... of course. Mirror there: https://gitlab.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
29.
by michaelmure 3y ago
Daily reminder that https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug could use some help :-D
30.
by michaelmure 3y ago
If that makes you mad, I still need help with https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug ;-) Coming at some point, kanban and pull-request support, offline-first!

More ›