michaelmrose

5 ms·

1.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
Which seems massively worse than a real local device in fact 2x is probably untenable to the point of uselessness because actually privacy sensitive matters need actual privacy that can't be defeated by your government telling Google t
2.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
You lose rollbacks, superior syncing, redundancy and data integrity assurance and add complexity for what deceased ssd wear which is hardly an actual problem.
3.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
[flagged]
4.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
It's not stealing but arguing that it's not infringement because its on the internet is pretty obviously nonsense.
5.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
If you already know the answer and everyone already knows the answer you asking this question is wasting everyone's time.
6.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
You ought to be able to back this up with sources other than trust me bro
7.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
Both can be negligent at once.
8.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
The only people in a position to show this are the idiots responsible for the current broken system. Deep analysis will have to come after regime change
9.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
sycophancy It wasn't "better" it was better at kissing your ass which matches what a lot of people want in a partner.
10.
by michaelmrose 1mo ago
Define insanely complex and deep in a way that isn't illiterate hand waving. Most humans are dumber than a box of rocks. Here in Seattle we had one of many light rail-related fuckups where they had to replace part of the line with buse
11.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Can you explain why you need one machine never falling over ever instead of a cluster of machines never falling over at once collectively?
12.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
I have seen several because family members have owned them. They are nondescript black rectangles that are owned by cheap people and kids. There is no reason for you to notice them in particular and it's useful to remember our percepti
13.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
It's not. It's an excellent example that economic value!= value. Your facile dodge isn't an argument and suggests you lack one.
14.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
If we value things according to their monetary value we must conclude that Elon musk is more valuable than every teacher in Americas labor for the next decade. Economic value is oft divorced entirely from any notion of real value. What you
15.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
For open source software it would be a massive increase in development time, difficulty, and continued costs that dwarf income to switch to the web. It would be shocking if it happened not the reverse. This is just for application software
16.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Regulation is on average stunning effective. You simply complely fail to notice all the times it works, notice whenever it doesn't, and profess that it doesn't. There is no meaningful alternatives.
17.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
This is dumb. You need two teams ideally the same app or business in different markets for a business quarter. One should be a college student doing the entire job and the other an ai with a human assistant directed to only do exactly what
18.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
People are financing small consumer goods with 3 digit price tags because they can't afford their mediocre already leveraged life. They borrow high 4 to low 5 figures for a car because they can't get to work to earn money so they
19.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
I am extremely biased. I have an entire world view and like everyone else I tend to believe things that concur with what I already believe and reject things that are inconsistent correctly or incorrectly. For instance rejection of "mai
20.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Let's pick one. Why is the BBC trash?
21.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
> The very power of Lisp, macros, dynamic programming, reflection lead to a mess of an ecosystem where every single developer reinvents the wheel and nobody can understand yet another DSL invented by the next developer next to them. Have
22.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Infinite scroll is a shit pattern it creates complexity and makes it hard to get back to a position on the generated and changeable list. It can also be unexpected slow. Everyone knows a page load can be slow if their Internet is slow but a
23.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Every fake automated action should generate a real fine paid to the party they screwed over even when or if it's reversed.
24.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Even windows has this software out of the box because it is so obviously useful
25.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
The original proposal was to use a visual hash designed to identify known bad CSAM images even if cropped or otherwise edited. Your computer would scan all your stuff for these images and report you to apple who would report you to the cops
26.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
I want a back button and a button to the left with a double arrow back like Rewind and for the browser to maintain both a buffer of prior pages and one at least as long of prior root sites with right-click showing this list
27.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
The actual study is more circumspect than this click bait and examines pretty deliberately how people respond to inaccurate data. It's neither a trick nor a design flaw. It's literally the thrust of the study.
28.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
It still proves something much narrower. Wherein AI is insufficient to answer, people are apt to rely on it anyway. A good real-world issue is health, where the issues are very complicated with many things poorly defined even at the state o
29.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
The only reasons to entertain that perspective is their personal delusions which they ought not impose on others also when an act takes place in one jurisdiction wherein all actors are within that jurisdiction it is obviously nonsense to ap
30.
by michaelmrose 2mo ago
Generally filling up the buffer is fine. It's perfectly normal that after viewing a certain number of documents one has to manually decide where to go. You know what you need. A button that goes back but instead of going to the prior d

More ›