mhykim

6 ms·

1.
by mhykim 8mo ago
I think we’re aligned on the hard parts here, so let me be precise. We’re not wide open for abuse nor are we bypassing the hard parts of email reputation. Quite the opposite. We also utilize SES's infrastructure and monitor reputation
2.
by mhykim 8mo ago
We do have robust checks in place to catch spam and bad actors(reputation, SPF DKIM DMARC, etc.) but as with all tools there will be bad actors who come up with creative ways to scheme for nefarious purposes. We expect our infra and policie
3.
by mhykim 8mo ago
I think there will be bad actors in any field, and right now, a lot of agent-based outreach might fall into that bucket, so its rational to be initially skeptical. The more interesting shift isnt whether humans will keep using email with ag
4.
by mhykim 8mo ago
Nope AgentMail is its own infra. Not a single line of Gmail/Outlook code in the codebase
5.
by mhykim 8mo ago
The tradeoff isnt agents vs humans its where humans sit in the loop. Sure hiring 10–100 humans gives accountability, but reality is it doesn't scale in any comparable way compared to agents in speed, coverage, or responsiveness. The sh
6.
by mhykim 8mo ago
Fair concern, and I agree on the end state. Agents will eventually use native agent-to-agent protocols. The question is the transition, because email is undoubtedly the most ubiquitous channel of communication in today. I would only give my
7.
by mhykim 8mo ago
Email is already the internet’s identity layer. By giving agents their own inbox they don't need to borrow human identity rather act as first class actors on their own. It lets agents plug into the same trust systems the web already us
8.
by mhykim 1y ago
Hey sauwan, wanted to follow up here. We as of 2 days ago just released our $20/month tier! If you haven't reached out yet already, its live on our website: agentmail.to Let me know if you have any questions!
9.
by mhykim 1y ago
MCP's are great as another communication medium with these agents(we have an MCP server as well!) The problem we are primarily solving is the scale at which you can provision inboxes to these agents in the first place. With Gmail there