mhl47

5 ms·

1.
by mhl47 2mo ago
If you can touch type try this: Go through they keys once alphabetical 'abcd...' recalling the movement from the letter. Then do it the other way round and move your fingers in spatial sequence to the keys and try to recall the l
2.
by mhl47 3mo ago
Absolutely can relate. Thats why I would say: Do your own diagrams! At least the text and formatting. Where I do think it ads value is "AI slop 2". This is somehow even better comprehensible than an average photo.
3.
by mhl47 3mo ago
Maybe there is a bias for action within our moral and legal system. Fundamentally if you can deal with uncertainty correctly or "perfectly" wouldn't more information always be better?
4.
by mhl47 3mo ago
Everybody remember when Zuckerberg told in an Interview in 2024 that human data does not matter that much or more specifically "individual creators or publishers tend to overestimate the value of their specific content". Something
5.
by mhl47 3mo ago
This does surprise me, because you'd think that even if they crank up the filter's sensitivity at the expense of specificity, an LLM company wouldn't simply design a filter that triggers on keywords in a completely unrelated
6.
by mhl47 3mo ago
First test question: "Is the UV Index a good proxy for when to wear sunglasses." Immediately triggered the safety filter ... oh dear.
7.
by mhl47 4mo ago
What wasn't build with AI is that webpage and it's tiny non-scaling text.
8.
by mhl47 5mo ago
Social Media creates distinctive Filter Bubbles. A dominant LLM company (or multiple aligned ones) create one way of thinking.
9.
by mhl47 6mo ago
Was looking for a precise term for that. Thank you! Also AI-Linkedin-Bullshit likes to use "just" additionally and it's mostly along the lines of Y being something much more impactful then X.
10.
by mhl47 6mo ago
The knowledge that everything is made out of atoms/molecules however makes it much easier to reason about your environment. And based on this knowledge you also learn algorithms, how to solve problems etc. I dont think its possible to
11.
by mhl47 6mo ago
How do you arrive at the statement that a cavemen would have the same intelligence as a human today? Intelligence is surely not usually defined as the cognitive potential at birth but as the current capability. And the knowledge an average
12.
by mhl47 6mo ago
"External Storage" whatever that is can not be the same as continous learning as it does not have the strong connections/capture the interdepencies of knowledge. That said I think we will see more efforts also on the business
13.
by mhl47 6mo ago
Most beyond products I know don't even contain soy as protein source. Regardless of what you think about phytooestrogens (which has very little evidence to have negative effects in normal quantities)
14.
by mhl47 7mo ago
The fact that the outputs are probabilities is not important. What is important is how that output is computed. You could imagine that it is possible to learn certain algorithms/ heuristics that "intelligence" is comprised of
15.
by mhl47 8mo ago
Worriesome for sure. However I would say that the cited studies are somewhat outdated already compared e.g. with GPT-5-Thinking doing 2mins of reasoning/search about a medical question. As far as I know Deepseeks search capabilities ar
16.
by mhl47 8mo ago
Or there are global events that stress people out .. or their expectations change over time. Not that simple ;)
17.
by mhl47 8mo ago
You are right, just tried even with reference images it can't do it for me. Maybe with some good prompting. Because in theory I would say that knowledge is something that does not have to be baked in the model but could be added using
18.
by mhl47 10mo ago
We are currently working on some christmas puzzle, that are - I would say - a bit more difficult from the visual side. GPT5.1 completely failed at all of them while Gemini 3 solved two till know that I would consider rather impressive. One
19.
by mhl47 10mo ago
Most people are missing the point here. Testing the GUI/feature more reliable is something that Gemini 3 could unlock (looking at the ScreenSpot-Pro benchmark and its general improvement on visual understanding). At least for the (hob
20.
by mhl47 1y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44573195 (in the article, search for:"Chat runs really deep")
21.
by mhl47 1y ago
There was a recent post here about how deeply ingrained the chat interface is in OpenAIs organization. This really doubles down on that, but does anyone really like to interact with so much language instead of visual elements? Also feels ho
22.
by mhl47 1y ago
Currently trying to build #6. Just for private use. My hope is that by throwing a bunch of highly personalized information in a VLM it will provide reasonably first estimates. (E.g. if you see a bowl lentils I will probably have rice below
23.
by mhl47 1y ago
Pretty rich that you are complaining about generalization now where you made the initial statement that the "Car is absolutely essential for driving around small kids no matter the urban density" which doesn't seem to have an
24.
by mhl47 1y ago
Yes but isn't the cat out of the box already? Don't we have sufficiently strong local models that can be finetuned in various ways to rewrite text/alternate images and thus destroy possible watermarks. Sure in some cases a mo
25.
by mhl47 1y ago
I think an example would be the two body problem. It stays on an eccentricity. So it does not explore different eccentricities although they can have the same total energy. (But I just looked that up too because this concept is mostly use
26.
by mhl47 1y ago
This is related to the question whether a system/the universe is ergodic (among other properties changing energy, space).
27.
by mhl47 1y ago
No it's 100 a week for plus users.
28.
by mhl47 1y ago
Side note: What is going on with these comments on Mathstodon? From moon landing denials, to insults, allegations that he used AI to write this ... almost all of them are to some capacity insane.
29.
by mhl47 1y ago
In theory, nearly all of them? Many of those things could be improved today without AI but e.g. raising Incidents for issues outside of your control could also give you a suggestion already that you just have to tick off. Not saying we are
30.
by mhl47 1y ago
And interestingly it's still not even close to what a good human artist could do in this task having the same data.

More ›