mgraczyk

8 ms·

1.
by mgraczyk 13d ago
this is needlessly pedantic first, they are certainly not instructions so that is a much worse name but more importantly, we use words in new contexts all the time. Do you object to calling the computer device "mouse" because it&#
2.
by mgraczyk 1mo ago
no, this is false. watermarking will not enforce anything like this
3.
by mgraczyk 2mo ago
5g/day
4.
by mgraczyk 2mo ago
I also started sleeping measurably better when I started taking creatine, but the broader evidence strongly suggests this was some kind of coincidence
5.
by mgraczyk 3mo ago
"got caught" to clarify, this behavior was announced with the model release
6.
by mgraczyk 3mo ago
The numbers are public now, this is obviously false
7.
by mgraczyk 3mo ago
For your math to make sense, Google would have to sell its stake this year There may be more to it than buying compute but what you're saying does not make sense for Google. More likely Google wants a good relationship with SpaceX and
8.
by mgraczyk 4mo ago
dangerous thing to believe IMO The models will get better, you will notice, everyone will notice. They will get better at coding and everything else. You should plan around that.
9.
by mgraczyk 4mo ago
CSS is badly designed and uses a confusing, separate DSL with arbitrary rules designed before the Internet was widely used, before web apps existed, before smartphones etc It's trash and throwing it out is good. Not learning it is good
10.
by mgraczyk 4mo ago
Don't bet on the sigmoid flattening out any time soon. I don't know when it will flatten, but it definitely won't be within the next 2 years
11.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
This will probably happen but I wouldn't plan on it happening soon
12.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
What are you talking about, in what way is this supposed to be an argument about ads? It sounds like your dryer broke
13.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
It's not a good reason to be skeptical about cars as a technology (and by analogy brain computer interfaces)
14.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
I've never seen an ad delivered through any of these things. On smartphones I mean the phone/OS itself It would be very easy to deliver ads via electricity. The utility could require you watch an ad before using more
15.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
I didn't list fridges because I've seen ads there, but these seem to have gone away in newer models (people don't like ads)
16.
by mgraczyk 5mo ago
Except this hasn't happened with electricity, cars, washing machines, smartphones, smart watches, Bluetooth headphones, ... Not all technology is bad
17.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
I don't understand in what sense they faked the process. What I've heard described is substantially similar to other SOC2 processes I've seen And yes SOC2 is fake. Have you ever heard of a startup failing to get soc2 or doing
18.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
What evidence did you collect that was not automated?
19.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
I haven't seen that and all the reports I got were under nda
20.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Having gone through the SOC2 process multiple times and having worked with and read SOC2 reports from many public companies, it's difficult for me to understand the outrage. The specific fraud allegations are bad (lying about US based
21.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
No the title is correct and you are misreading or didn't read. It was found with Claude code, that's the quote. This isn't a model eval, it's an Anthropic employee talking about Claude code. So comparing to other models
22.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
How many people have you interviewed and hired? I have interviewed around 400 and hired around 20, and I've seen data compiled on over 100,000 interviews. I have never worried about a false negative, except DEI stuff pre-2021 Maybe thi
23.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
> I am just not a fan of these types of interviews they tell absolutely nothing about the candidate. Unfortunately this is wrong and I have seen tons of data at 5 companies showing this. These kinds of interviews really do correlate well
24.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Still plenty of signal. You'd be surprised at how badly most people do at very simple questions.
25.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Sure let's do it. I am pretty confident mine will be more maintainable, because I am an extremely good software engineer, AI is a powerful tool, and I use AI very effectively I would literally claim that with AI I can work faster and p
26.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Somehow we went from writing software apps and reading API docs to research level astrophysics Sure it's not there yet. Give it a few months
27.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
How about we do the following. I have not done win32 programming in 12 years. Maybe you've done it more recently. I'll use an LLM and you look up things manually. We can see, who can build a win32 admin UI that shows a realtime vi
28.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Yes you have to be careful, but the LLM will read and process core and documentation literally millions of times faster than you, so it's worth it
29.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
Because it will take you years to read all the information you can get funneled through an LLM in a day
30.
by mgraczyk 6mo ago
I don't pay for slack any more, I just picked the price of their enterprise plan. Large users probably get big discounts but it doesn't matter, the cutoff where this makes sense financially is probably around 4000 employees even a

More ›